TechWhirl Sponsors

---

 

TECHWR-L Mailing List Archive November 1994

---

1062 messages

Author Index (Switch to Thread Index)

---

Aahz

• Zie/zir
• Re: Letters and E-mail
• Re: Background
• Backups and fileservers
• Usenet vs. Internet (was Re: TECHWR-L available as newsgroup????)
• Re: Andy Rooney
• Re: mom
• Thank you and goodbye
• Re: generic "he"
• Re: Re[2]: Presentations (long post -- but no Mom or PC)

Ad absurdum per aspera

• Re: Introduction + Hobbies on Resumes/CVs
• Re: Gallons in an Olympic Swimming Pool?
• Re: Future of Technical Writing
• Re: Re[2]: Creativity and 'cross-linking' in the brain
• Re: Peter Drucker's article in the Atlantic Monthly
• Making it ugly
• Technical vitality?
• Re: using "chair"

Alan McGrane

• Jobs at Uniface in Amsterdam!

AMM

• E-mail test

AMMUNSON

• WWW suggestion

amy welden

• Re: Foreign languages a measure of intelligence?

Anatole Wilson

• letters and e-mail
• Creativity
• Sie/hir

Ann Amsler

• Re: Frame to HTML conversions
• Re: Citing the Internet

Arlen P. Walker

• Re: Looking for HTML information
• Re[2]: "Y'all" usage at MIT
• Please Help (update)
• We're not so bad after all, folks
• Servers vs. local
• Re: Clogging the Net
• Re: To flame or not to flame;
• Re[2]: video scripting
• Re[2]: Creativity and 'cross-linking' in the brain
• Re[4]: Creativity and 'cross-linking' in the brain
• Re[2]: H/W v S/W difficulty
• Re[2]: Make It Pretty
• Re: Wherever you go--
• Re[2]: women and men (was Re: Hey, take it easy!)
• Re: Macintosh System 7.5
• Re[2]: Punctuation names (...catch that peeve!)
• Re: Dave Meek: Spokesperson for Minorities???
• Re: Punctuation names (catch that peeve)
• Re: Built-in to vs. built in to
• Re: Audience Awareness
• Database

Art Cline

• Subscribe

Arthur Comings

• Foreign languages a measure of intelligence?
• Posting to everybody
• Re: Make It Pretty
• Long post on passive voice

Barb Miller

• Re: Math vs. writing
• Standards of Conduct doc

Barb Philbrick

• Background
• Re: your mail
• Minnesota job fair
• Re: Creativity
• Re: Grammar checking tool
• MA in Tech Writing?
• Icons for Cautions, Warni
• Re: **Defining Tech Comm*
• Re[2]: Make It Pretty

Barbara Rigg-Healy

• indexing with Quark

Beth Camp

• Re: your mail

Binion Amerson

• Document Revision Control
• FrameMaker on UNIX Workstations

Bob Stromberg

• For IBM employees

Bonni J. Graham

• Re: hot spot?
• topic vs audience
• Re: Contract writing (was Job Futures for Tech Writing)

Bonnie Nestor (NESTORM -at- FEDC04 -dot- FED -dot- ORNL -dot- GOV

• Re: Buckaroo Banzai

Brian Berry

• rRE: lurkers

Brian F. Gregg, N04-3A, ext. 2724

• Re: Letters and E-mail
• Re: Meetings and Classes: A Flame
• Re: Measuring Productivity
• Re: Time for a new thread--field contacts
• Re: Editing a Design Doc.
• Re: spoken & written usage
• Re: Measuring Productivity
• Re: Returned mail: Host unknown

Brown, David W [RV]

• Re: BELL CURVE

Bruce Covell

• Re: Online Help Help

burgamw1

• Re: Make it pretty

C Cone

• Editing and the Internet: Questions for Research

Carl Gotlieb

• Re: Make It Pretty

Carma C Allen

• Re: Background
• Re: Icons for Cautions, Warnings

Caryn Rizell

• Re: Letters and E-mail
• Re: Limited Experience on Resumes
• Re: Math vs. writing
• Re: marking periods

cathy pacza

• Re: Multimedia as part of a T...

Chantel Reynolds

• newbies
• prerequisites
• math/science/techwr people

Charles Bottoms

• Measuring Productivity

Charles Sides

• California info?

Chris Dresden/HQ/3Com

• Icons for Cautions, Warnings
• KNOCK IT OFF, BUBBA!!

Chris Frederick Willis

• Re: Login, Log in, Log into

Christopher M. Fisher

• Re: Lotus Notes

Christopher Miller

• Re: Wherever you go--
• e-mail
• e-mail
• e-mail survey

Christopher Werry

• Prof Writing and Rhetoric
• Re: Advertising on the net?

Chuck Martin

• Re: Help file resumes
• Leaving list (temporarily)

Claudia Allen

• Re: he/she

Coleen MacKay

• Re: Documentation Estimates
• Enjoy. Not tech writing.

COMMWLB

• Reminder; Changed Deadline

Cordell Woods

• Re: Document Revision Control

crain

• Style Guides

Cynthia Schwartz

• Wherever you go--
• The Mother
• HTML

D. 'Shag' Birchall

• Re: Tech Writing Future & Pen-based computing

dagmar

• Re: Creativity
• Re: Future of Technical Writing (PEN based Technology)

Dan Lupo

• Documenting HW vs SW
• [no subject]
• PC Comments
• PC Comments

DARCEY HARDING

• AOL
• quick Word question about ASCII text
• another passive voice question

Dave Hayes

• Re: Folks, this is getting ridiculous.
• Re: More Mom (and Re: Wherever you go...)

Dave L. Meek's User Account

• Re: women and men (was Re: Hey, take it eas
• PC Comments
• Re: generic "he"
• PC Comments
• he/she
• Re: he/she

DAVEDCS

• Wanted: Tech Writers - Unix and OO Knowledge, CT and NYC
• Re: Tech Writer Jobs in N.E.

David Blyth @second

• Math vs. writing
• Math vs. writing
• Creativity
• PC Comments
• Audience Awareness
• PC Comments
• Audience Awareness
• Audience Awareness

David Dubin

• Font Facts
• Re: War
• Andy Roony and the Underwood
• Re: Survey: # programmers per tech writer
• Lotus Notes is...
• Use of Passive Voice
• Re: Bubba

David E. Damouth

• WRITING LAB (fwd)

David Farkas

• Re: **Defining Tech Comm**
• Re: **Defining Tech Comm**

David H. Porush

• CONFERENCE ANNOUNCEMENT & CALL FOR PAPERS
• Re: codes in subject lines

David Hancock

• Re: Passive voice

David Lenoir

• DTP/Graphic design lists
• MA in Tech Writing?
• RE MA in Technical Writing: Thank-you!

David Medinets

• Re: structured writing (Information Mapping)

David Oberstadt

• Wanted: Examples of poor English from Japanese

David Venzke

• HTML Editors

Dayna Marie Barnes

• Lost kids

Debbie Molinaro

• Make It Pretty

Debby Moller

• Frame to HTML conversions
• Windows translations (Borland)
• Untitled

DEborah Bosley FEN00DSB -at- UNCCVM>UNCC>EDU

• [no subject]

Derrel Fincher, Dowell

• Re: Letters and E-mail
• Time for a new thread--field contacts

dials christopher jo

• Internet Research

Dianne Driskell

• Re: mom
• Re: using "chair"
• Re: Audience Awareness

Dick Price

• Re: Technical writing
• Re: Where do electrons go when...?
• Re[2]: Math & Writing (A Freudian Analysis)
• Re: Editing and the Internet
• [no subject]

DIGEST Paul Moloney

• Re[2]: Introduction + Hobbies on Resumes/CVs

dl_crockford

• HTML Document Structure

DOCESM

• Quark mailing list?

Don Sargent

• Background

dorselj1

• Lotus Notes

doug montalbano

• Re: Go
• Wherever you go ...
• Re[2]: Presentations (long post -- but no Mom or PC)

Doug, Data Librarian at Ext 4225

• Re: hobbies on your resume
• Re: Community College Teaching with MS
• Re: Background
• [no subject]
• Re: Can I Have Your Opinions and Ideas on Audience?
• Re: Can I Have Your Opinions (Long text)
• Re: Measuring Productivity
• Re: Math vs. writing
• Re: Future of Technical Writing
• Re: H/W v S/W difficulty
• Re: Creativity
• Re: What else to tech. communicators do?
• Re: e-mail
• This is for Dan Lupo
• Re: Audience Awareness
• Re: Audience Awareness
• Re: On Line Documents?
• Re: Online Documents (*Very* long post)
• Re: Re[2]: Tech Writing Future & Pen-based computing
• Re: Is passive voice ever OK?
• Re: Job Futures for Tech Writing

DSN::HARRISON

• First and Subsequent use of TM in doc

Ed Hoornaert

• Re: Math vs. writing
• Creativity

ej0

• Job Futures for Tech Writing

Elaine Winters

• Re: Background
• Re: Foreign languages a measure of intelligence?
• Region 8 conference
• Re: Creativity and 'cross-linking' in the brain
• Re: teaching
• Re: teaching
• Re: Re[2]: Creativity and 'cross-linking' in the brain

Ellen Adams

• Tech Writing Future & Pen-based computing
• e-mail
• Re: Tech Writing Future & Pen-based computing
• Re: Sie/hir
• Esperanto and sexless language
• Passive voice

Ellen Snell Adams

• Invoke or Use
• Esperanto, the last word

Elna . Tymes

• Re: MA in Tech Writing?

Eric J. Ray

• Information from TECHWR-L Listowner
• Topics and Stuff (was Background)
• Re[2]: **Defining Tech Comm**
• Msg from Listowner: Topics and Stuff
• Information from TECHWR-L Listowner
• List Behavior

Erich J. Horn

• Re: your mail
• Re: Yo! Gary! Cut it out!I
• Re: repeat messages

Erik Harris

• Re: Background
• Re: Help file resumes
• Re: Letters and E-mail
• Re: Re[2]: Help file resumes
• Re: *** Q: WHAT KIND OF PEOPLE ON THE NET ?
• Re: Math & Writing (A Freudian Analysis)
• Re: Introduction + Hobbies on Resumes/CVs
• Re: Idle questions - Humor (fwd)
• Re: Future of Technical Writing
• Re: Re[2]: Tech Writing Future & Pen-based computing

Faith Weber

• Hi! I'm ba-a-a-a-ck!
• Re: spoken & written usage

Fisher, Julie

• What else to tech. communicators do?
• Re: Survey: Techwr-L Listserv

Frank Ripp, Ext 1313

• Looking for HTML information

Fred Wersan

• font editing programs?
• To Jane Torpie

Gabe Goldberg

• Re: PC Comments
• Re: Book Master Information Wanted

Gail Lippincott

• No Subject
• No Subject

garcia

• Wordperfect 6.1

Gary Beason

• Re: women and men (was Re: Hey, take it eas
• [no subject]
• [no subject]
• [no subject]
• [no subject]
• [no subject]
• [no subject]
• [no subject]
• [no subject]
• [no subject]
• [no subject]
• [no subject]
• [no subject]
• [no subject]
• [no subject]
• [no subject]
• [no subject]
• [no subject]
• [no subject]
• [no subject]
• repeat messages
• an explanation & apology

genie-postmaster

• Re: Math vs. writing, what it takes, and de-lurking

George F. Hayhoe III

• Making It Pretty
• Making It Pretty--Study Referenced in Earlier Posting
• First Report on Corel Ventura 5

Giovanna Patani

• Phoenix Chapter November Meeting

Giselle Weiss

• Editing and the Internet

GKushmerek

• Peeves, misc. topics

Glen Accardo

• Re: Background
• Re: Idle questions - Humor (fwd)
• Re: Invoke or Use
• Re: TECHWR-L available as newsgroup????

Glenn Crumpley

• Bell Curve

Gregg Roberts

• HOW I BECAME ...

griggs karen s

• Re: Style Guides
• Re: teaching
• audience awareness and style

gui . gordon

• Re: hobbies on your resume
• enough already
• HTML editor for Mac

Gwen Barnes

• Invoke or Use
• Andy Roony and the Underwood
• Re: spoken & written usage
• Tech Writing Future & Pen-based computing
• Re: Re[2]: Tech Writing Future & Pen-based computing
• cement heads

Gwen Gall

• Re: World Wide Web
• Re: Passive voice + Writing Func. Specs
• Re: Long post on passive voice

harold (h.o.n.) floysvik

• Re: "Y'all" usage at MIT
• Re: More Mom

Harold Henke

• HTML and WWW
• OOP Writers (Don Sargent and Jane Torpie Comments)

Heather Lum

• job opportunity

hfi

• Re: Cost Savings and Online Help

holland

• Corel Ventura
• invoke?!!

Jack Molisani

• Survey: # programmers per tech writer
• Re: Survey: # programmers per tech writer
• Developer/Writer Survey Results

James Browne

• Re: Invoke or Use

James Inman

• Background

Jan Bates

• Re: International Recruiters
• Re: *** Q: WHAT KIND OF PEOPLE ON THE NET ?
• Re: *** Q: WHAT KIND OF PEOPL...
• Sie/hir
• Re: spoken & written usage

Jan Boomsliter

• INTECOM
• Re: H/W v S/W difficulty
• mom
• Re: Punctuation names (...catch that peeve!)
• Re: e-mail
• cement heads
• Re: Punctuation names (catch that peeve)
• Re: generic "he"
• Re: generic "he"
• Re: Audience Awareness
• Re: generic "he"
• Re: Passive voice
• Re: Is passive voice ever OK?
• Re: Book Master Replies

Jan Tazelaar

• Subscription request

Jane Bowerman

• Re: Go

Jane S Torpie

• Re: Background
• Re: Letters and E-mail
• Buying my Own Hardware
• Re: Editing a Design Doc.
• Re: First and Subsequent use of TM in doc
• Re: **Defining Tech Comm**
• Re: MA in Tech Writing?
• Re: Make It Pretty
• Presentations & Sherri Hall's class
• Re: generic "he"

Janet Foltz

• Grammar problem

Janet Valade

• Re: Hey, take it easy!

Janice Czyscon

• Course on Creating Structured Documents

Janice Wright

• Email stories wanted!

Jason Coleman

• Wanted: Fundraising Ideas for a new book!
• Wanted: Fundraising Ideas for a new book!
• Wanted: Fundraising Ideas for a new book!

JAY D KING

• Advertising on the net?

jcurran

• Re: dialect survey

Jeffrey A Pittman

• multi media
• teaching

Jefrson

• Math vs. writing
• Re: **Defining Tech Comm**
• Re: Shannon-Weaver Model

Jerre Beal (jbeal)

• Re: women and men (was Re: Hey, take it easy!)
• Research Triangle
• Re: **Defining Tech Comm**
• Re: Make It Pretty
• Re: Msg from Listowner: Topics and Stuff

Joan Masters

• Re: Job Futures for Tech Writing

Joan Smith

• Master's degree survey thanks and request

Joanne Saathoff

• Electronic Brochures?

Joe Chew

• Bad doc revisited

Joe Fockler

• Re: His/Her/Sie/Hir
• Re: Meetings and Classes: A Flame
• Re: Language and Intelligence
• Idle questions - Humor (fwd)

John Eldard

• Avionics Writer needed in Florida

John H. Olds

• Re: Can I Have Your Opinions ...
• Re: Multimedia as part of a T...

John Lee Bumgarner

• Foreign Languages as a Measure of Intelligence
• Re "Facts is facts" and IQ Tests
• Request for List Address
• Re: Lurkers
• Lurkers
• Re: spoken & written usage: a response to two threads
• Re: spoken & written usage
• Editorial Eye Address
• Re: FW: Creativity

John Russell

• Re: Servers vs. local

Johndan Johnson-Eilola

• Re: Shannon/Weaver & Fiber Optics

Johns, David

• Invoke vs. Use
• Indexing
• Discretionary Indexing
• Indexing

Joseph J Little

• **Defining Tech Comm**
• Technical Communication and Cognitive Science
• BS and MS at same university
• STC Grad Schools w/CogSci
• Shannon-Weaver Model

Joyce & Cordell Woods

• Macintosh System 7.5
• Re: hot spot?

Joyce K. Genser

• Re: *** Q: WHAT KIND OF PEOPL...

JPG3

• MA/NH Tech Writiing Conference Announcement
• Re: Help...
• Re: your mail

Judith Grobe Sachs

• "All you need is a pencil"

Judith Hammeran

• Is passive voice ever OK?
• Re: Contract Work

Julie Gephart

• Re: Thanks re assert/de-assert

Julius Willis

• Re: Automatic Backups in FrameMaker

K. Edgcombe

• Re: *** Q: WHAT KIND OF PEOPLE ON THE NET ?

Karen Kay

• Re: Background
• Re: Background
• Re: Letters and E-mail
• Re: Background
• Re: Clogging the Net
• Re: *** Q: WHAT KIND OF PEOPLE ON THE NET ?
• Re: Letters and E-mail
• Re: "Come with," "I want to go with," and so on.
• Re: Sorry
• Re: Request for List Address
• Re: Another Web page for tech
• Re: Equipment needs
• Re: Math vs. writing cont.,
• Re: spoken & written usage
• Re: TECHWR-L available as newsgroup????
• Re: TECHWR-L available as newsgroup????
• Re: spoken & written usage
• Re: Re[4]: Creativity and 'cross-linking' in the brain
• Re: Wherever you go--
• Re: Sie/hir
• Re: Esperanto and sexless language
• Re: Advertising on the net?
• Re: PC Comments
• Re: PC Comments
• Re: enough already
• Re: Contract writing (was Job Futures for Tech Writing)

Karen Marie Bowen

• Citing the Internet

Karen Mayberry

• Tech Writer Opening (Illinois)
• Measuring Doc. Quality?

Karen Riley

• relocating to Delaware

karis william

• [no subject]
• [no subject]

Karla McMaster

• Re: Background
• Re[2]: dialect survey
• Re: Wherever you go--
• Re[2]: Tech Writing Future & Pen-based computing
• Contract writing (was Job Futures for Tech Writing)

Kat Nagel

• Where do electrons go when...?
• Re: electron woes
• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 9 Nov 1994 to 11 Nov 1994
• TECHWR-L available as newsgroup????
• Re: Versionitis
• Re: invoke
• FWD> OWL (online writing lab)
• Re: student critiques
• Memory needed for Photoshop?
• Re: PC inanities (flame alert)

Kate M. Jarsulic

• Re: Documentation Estimates

Kathryn E. Leventhal-Arnold

• Re: First and Subsequent use of TM in doc

Kathy Moore

• Re: Wherever you go--
• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 21 Nov 1994 to 22 Nov 1994

Kay Wicker - Documentation

• More online help help

Keith Ivey

• Re: Editorial Eye address?
• Re: using "chair"

Keith Soltys

• Another Web page for tech
• Re: Another Web page for
• Re: Another Web page for

Ken d'Albenas

• Documenting software that uses GNU

kendrick catherine

• wordperfect 6.1

Kevin S. Wilson

• Request for Help-File Resumes
• Re: Request for List Address
• Mom Has Stayed Quite Long Enough
• Passive Voice

Killer of Trees

• Re: Background

Kim Ferri 415-428-2710

• Re: Make It Pretty

Kimberley Lackey

• Math vs. writing
• Math vs. writing cont.,

Kirk Foster

• Me Tooo.. Looking for HTML information
• What's happening--out of the loop--not getting mail

KnoxML1

• What software are you using?
• Is passive voice ever OK?

Kristi L Koscianski

• Re: Icons for Cautions, Warnings
• Re: Icons for Cautions, Warning
• Re: Multimedia

laila

• Letters and E-mail

Lanny J. Miller

• Request for Digest Version

Lara Butterworth

• On-line Help Help!!

Larry Kunz ((919) 254-6395)

• Folks, this is getting ridiculous.
• **Defining Tech Comm**

Laura Johnson

• Re: Punctuation names (...catch that peeve!)

Laurel Meier

• Survey: Techwr-L Listserv

Laurie Rubin

• Re: Please Help (update)
• Re: Automatic Backups in FrameMaker
• Editing a Design Doc.
• Re: Suffering succotash
• Re: Future of Technical Writing (was "Can I Have Your Opinions")
• Re: Mom
• Re: Make It Pretty
• Re: Sie/hir

LaVonna Funkhouser

• Resumes designed as online "help" docs

Lawrence \"Lonnie\" Brennan

• [no subject]
• Re: Meetings and Classes: A Flame

LENDA ZIEGLER

• style guides
• style guide survey

Less is more.

• Technical Art Competition still open for entries

Linda H. Schoenhoff

• Re: Documentation Estimates

Linda Queen

• Tech Writer Needed with Oracle Skills

Lindamood, Brad

• Re: DTP/Graphic design lists
• Re: Minnesota job fair
• [no subject]

Lise A Hansen

• Re: teaching

Liz Babcock

• Re- Background
• Re- Wherever you go--

Lori A. Moreland

• Re: Hey, take it easy!
• Re: Where do electrons go when...?
• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 14 Nov 1994 to 15 Nov 1994
• Re: Wow! We're way off the subject!

Lori Lathrop

• Serendipity
• Re: Editorial Eye address?
• Re: e-mail
• Measuring Doc. Quality?
• Re: Documentation Estimates (long posting)
• Indexing with Doc-To-Help
• Re: Discretionary Indexing

Louise Penberthy

• Re: dialect survey

Luisa Lago

• Re: Jobs in Chicago?
• Re: Idle questions - Humor (fwd)

Marc Paquette

• Re: Lurkers
• Scientist/artists? (was Re: Creativity)

Marc Santacroce

• Re: Andy Rooney succumbs
• Re: Measuring Productivity
• Re: Minnesota job fair
• Re: Make It Pretty
• Re: Job fairs
• Re: e-mail
• Re: Sie/hir
• Re: What software are you using?
• Re: Survey: # programmers per tech writer
• Re: Standards of Conduct doc

Margaret Penman

• Hello from Oz and Re: Foreign languages...
• Re: Can I Have Your Opinions (Long text)
• New Science Communicators Assoc. in Oz
• Maths vs Writing (Long text)
• Re: spoken & written usage
• Re: Audience Awareness

Margaret Redding

• Editing conference papers...
• Re: Another Web page for tech
• Help...

Marianne Adams

• Re: What software are you using?

Marilyn Gelman

• Re: Mom
• USAir New Hire to Seek Manuals

Marilyn_Osterman . Radiology's_Mail_Server_NW040

• Re: Math vs. writing

Marilynne Smith

• Background
• Re: Punctuation Inside Qu
• Re: Why Internships Indee
• Re: Clogging the Net
• Re: Letters and E-mail
• Re: Help file resumes
• To flame or not to flame;
• Measuring Productivity
• Re: Measuring Productivit
• Re: spoken & written usag
• Re: Mom

Mark Leeuwenburgh

• Boston STC Nov Program

Mark Levinson

• DTP list
• Suffering succotash
• Andy Rooney succumbs
• Babytalk
• Durante on creativity
• An idle question
• Creativity vs. clarity
• What software
• Background of Esperanto

Mark Sanders

• Built in or Built-in
• [no subject]

Marsha Wolicki

• Thanks re assert/de-assert
• Enjoy. Not tech writing.

Marthat San

• [no subject]
• [no subject]

Mary Bull

• Re: Measuring Productivity
• Re: Editing a Design Doc.

Matt Abe

• TC WinHelp Interest Group Meeting

Matt Hicks

• Re: Servers vs. local
• Re: *** Q: WHAT KIND OF PEOPL...
• Re: Equipment needs
• women and men (was Re: Hey, take it easy!)
• Re: generic "he"
• Yo! Gary! Cut it out!

Matthew Wong

• Using Style/Grammar Checker
• Re: Math & Writing (A Freudian Analysis)

Matthew Worsnop

• How do I subscribe?

McMillin, Connie

• Re: On Line Documents?

Megan Douglas

• Sherri Hall's class

Megan Irvine

• Re: Wherever you go--

Melissa Hunter-Kilmer

• Re: Hey, take it easy!
• [no subject]
• Language and Intelligence
• Re: Where do electrons go when...?
• Mommmmmmmmm!
• Wherever you go
• Re[2]: Pogo yes, but...
• sie/hir

Michael A. Vealey

• Re: Wherever you go--

Michael Gos

• Re: Women and Men
• Re: Passive voice

Michael Keene

• Re: Math vs. writing, what it takes, and de-lurking
• Re: spoken & written usage
• Re: Creativity
• Re: **Defining Tech Comm**
• Re: Re[2]: Creativity and 'cross-linking' in the brain
• Re: your mail
• Re: BS and MS at same university
• Re: your mail
• Re: Pogo yes, but...
• Re: Audience, Power, and Authority

Michael LaTorra

• "Facts is facts"
• Re: "Facts is facts" and IQ tests
• Re: "Facts is facts" and IQ tests
• Re: Hello from Oz
• missing messages
• Re: Math vs. writing
• Re: mom
• Re: Make It Pretty
• Re: sie/hir
• Re: women and men
• Re: generic "he"
• Re: Re[2]: generic "he"

Micheal Uhl

• STC, Carolina Chapter meeting announcement

Michele Berkes 615-576-2352

• Frame users list
• Proceedings from PCOC 18

Mike Christie

• OS/2 WARP
• Limited Experience on Resumes
• Versionitis
• Font Creation

Mike Melby

• Multimedia

MONETTE DENISE P 678-3843 MACA

• Re: Background
• Just A Thought (Delete If You Wish)
• Clogging the Net Too!!!
• Re: spoken & written usage ("I go")
• Re: mom
• MA in Technical Writing?
• HUMOR?!? for Friday
• Re: Re[2]: women and men (was Re: Hey, take it easy!)

Montgomery, Kevin

• Job Posting - Denver

mpriestley

• Re: Invoke or Use
• Re: Sie/hir
• Re: another passive voice question
• [no subject]
• Re: he/she

mrw.EMAIL

• Re: Math vs. writing
• Re: Creativity
• Re: Mom
• Re: Make It Pretty

Nan Breedlove

• Re: Enjoy. Not tech writing.
• Turnkey Solutions to Online Documentation--Query

Nancy Hayes

• Re: Why Internships Indeed
• Re: Another Web page for tech
• Editorial Eye address?
• Re: Hey, take it easy!
• Re: Mommmmmmmmm!
• Re: BS and MS at same university

nancy ott

• Re: Background

Nancy S. Burns

• STC-Tucson Meeting Notice
• TO TERRI HUDSON, WILEY
• Re: Wanted: Examples of poor English from Japanese
• Presentations
• Re: generic "he"
• Re: Presentations

naomi (n.) bulka

• Re: Mom
• Re: email

Niall Johnson

• Moving right along

NMR Guru aka 'The Plate'

• Re: Documentation estimates

Nora Merhar

• Re: Help file resumes
• Re: dialect survey
• Meetings and Classes: A Flame
• Re: "Facts is facts" and IQ tests
• Re: Math vs. writing
• Re: mom
• 2 questions
• M.A. in Technical Writing
• Re: M.A. in Technical Writing (correction)
• Re: Is passive voice ever OK?

palilonis michael jo

• Re: International Recruiters
• Jobs in Chicago?
• Re: your mail

Pat Meador

• Hardware writing job in Austin, TX - REVISED

Patrick O'Connell

• Lurkers
• Folks, this is getting ridiculous.
• Guilty as charged, BUT...
• RE[2]: Bandwith
• Re: Jargon file ...

Patrik Boccara

• New subsciption

Paul Contursi

• Re: MA in Tech Writing?

Paul Gauthier

• Re: Idle questions and such

Paul MacGyver Carman

• Documentation Estimates
• Automatic Backups in FrameMaker
• Who DOES get the documentation?
• Frame to HTML

Paul Moloney

• Introduction + Hobbies on Resumes/CVs
• Re: Introduction + Hobbies on Resumes/CVs
• Ventura Pub Problem: Screen Graphics as Halftones
• Re: sie/hir

Paul R. Sawyer

• eWorld Question
• More Mom
• Profs & On-Line Classes

Paul Strandlund

• Background
• Re- Foreign languages a mea
• Re- *** Q- WHAT KIND OF PEO
• Re- "Come with," "I want to
• War - Teminology
• I Need an Address
• Re> Mom

Paula Steinhart

• Re: teaching

Peggy L. Currid

• Tech Writing Hierarchy
• Summary: TW Dept. Hierarchy (Long)

Peter Bergh

• DocMgt Experience/Bergh

Peter Parshall

• Position Available

Peter W Praetorius

• Re: MA in Tech Writing?

PICKETT-HARNER, Molly

• Re: e-mail

Pierre Didierjean

• *** Q: WHAT KIND OF PEOPLE ON THE NET ?

PJS Sisler

• Re: Community College Teaching with MS

QMS Account

• Looking for HTML Information
• Re: spoken & written usage
• Job Fairs
• Job Futures for Tech Writing

qwa

• Re: Another Web page for tech

Race, Paul

• Re: Font Facts
• Re: His/Her/Sie/Hir
• Re: Clogging the Net
• Re: Creativity
• Re: Creativity
• FW: Creativity
• Re: MA in Tech Writing?
• Re: Make It Pretty
• Re: Wherever you go--
• Re: BS and MS at same university
• copyrighting public domain material. Was Re: Wherever you go--
• Re: enough already
• Re: Enjoy. Not tech writing.

Randy Roberts

• Re: "Y'all" usage at MIT
• Correction

Ray Bruman

• Re: Wanted: Examples of poor English from Japanese
• Re: Measuring Productivity
• Re: Measuring Productivity
• Re: Icons for Cautions, Warnings
• Re: Icons for Cautions, Warnings
• Re: teaching
• Fiber Optics and Thoughtless Conventions

Ray Bruman x2325

• Clogging the Net
• Re: Idle questions - Humor (fwd)

Regina Doorlay

• Future of Technical Writing (was "Can I Have Your Opinions")
• Re: Icons for Cautions, Warning
• Teaching

Rene Jul-Hansen

• [no subject]

Rhonda Brown

• Looking for Public Relations Lists

Richard Lippincott

• Re: Hello from Oz
• Video Scripts
• Re: Help file resumes
• Re: Background
• Re: Help file resumes
• Re: Background
• Re: Letters and E-mail
• Background
• Re: The future of our profession & "Future Shock"
• Re: Automatic Backups in FrameMaker
• Re: We're not so bad after all, folks
• Internet and Disasters
• Re: newbies
• Video Scripting
• Re: Measuring Productivity
• Re: Math vs. writing
• Re: Math vs. writing
• Re: Idle questions - Humor (fwd)
• Re: Documenting HW vs SW
• Re: H/W v S/W difficulty
• Re: Invoke or Use
• Creativity
• Re: spoken & written usage
• Re: H/W v S/W difficulty
• Re: H/W v S/W difficulty
• Re: H/W v S/W difficulty
• Re: Job fairs
• Re: Job fairs
• Re: **Defining Tech Comm**
• Re: women and men (was Re: Hey, take it easy!)
• Creativity Quiz: Solution
• Re: teaching
• Subtle Word Meangins
• Re: Audience Awareness
• Re: Documentation Estimates
• Re: Documentation Estimates

Richard Mateosian

• Re: Background
• Math and writing
• Grammar problem
• H/W v S/W difficulty
• Andy Rooney
• Go
• Make It Pretty
• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 25 Nov 1994 to 26 Nov 1994

Richard Sobocinski

• Re: World Wide Web

Rita Harrison

• TECHWR-L Digest - 13 Nov 1994 to 14 Nov 1994 -Reply

Robert C. Oshinsky

• Please Help

Robert Davis

• [no subject]

Rollings, Gill

• Re: server vs. local
• Re: Grammar checking tools

Romay Jean Sitze

• Re: your mail
• Re: your mail
• Re: Can I Have Your Opinions and Ideas on Audience?
• Re: Help file resumes
• Re: relationship between languages spoken and intelligence
• Re: Foreign languages a measure of intelligence?
• Re: Hey, take it easy!
• Re: Hello from Oz and Re: Foreign languages...
• Re: Measuring Productivity
• Re: "All you need is a pencil"
• Re: spoken & written usage
• Re: Creativity
• Re: spoken & written usage
• Re: spoken & written usage
• Re: spoken & written usage
• Re: spoken & written usage ("I go")
• Re: spoken & written usage: a response to two threads
• Re: **Defining Tech Comm**
• Re: spoken & written usage
• Re: H/W v S/W difficulty
• Re: MA in Technical Writing?
• Re: Mom
• Re: MOM
• Re: your mail
• Re: teaching
• Re: teaching
• Re: your mail
• Re: Making It Pretty
• Re: your mail
• Re: More Mom
• Re: Hey, take it easy!
• Re: What else to tech. communicators do?
• Re: FW: Creativity
• Re: Mom
• Re: Mom
• Re: student critiques
• Re: Make It Pretty
• Re: BS and MS at same university
• Re: women and men (was Re: Hey, take it eas
• Re: What software are you using?
• Re: **Defining Tech Comm*
• Re: Re[2]: Presentations (long post -- but no Mom or PC)
• Re: Audience Awareness
• Re: Job Futures for Tech Writing

Ronald Lee Stone

• spoken & written usage
• Re: spoken & written usage
• student critiques
• Re: student critiques

Ronnie M Peters

• [no subject]

Rose Wilcox

• Re: Online Documentation Help Needed
• Re: Help file resumes
• Re: Can I Have Your Opinions and Ideas on Audience?
• Re: style guides
• Re: Background
• Re: Can I Have Your Opinions and Ideas on Audience?
• Re: Background
• Re: Background
• Re: Math vs. writing
• Re: spoken & written usage
• Re: Math vs. writing
• Re: Invoke vs. Use
• Re: Wherever you go--
• Re: Sie/hir
• Re: Presentations
• Re: Thank you, Michael, for "Display" explanation
• Re: Re[2]: Tech Writing Future & Pen-based computing
• Re: Sie/hir and "muddy waters"
• Re: Audience Awareness
• Online Help Help
• Re: Hotspots
• Re: Summary: TW Dept. Hierarchy - Reclassifying TW
• Re: another passive voice question

Sally Marquigny

• Re: Punctuation Inside Quotes
• Re: Letters and E-mail
• Math vs. writing (was Hello from Oz)
• Re: War - Teminology
• Re: DocMgt Experience/Bergh
• Re: Wanted: Fundraising Ideas for a new book!
• Re: More Mom
• 7 lashes with a wet noodle
• FW: 7 lashes with a wet noodle
• Re: Subtle Word Meangins
• Re: enough already
• Tech Writer Contract RTP, NC. - 3 Months ASAP!

Sandra Liles

• Re: **Defining Tech Comm**

Sarah Bane

• TW Teaching Position in Murray, KY
• TW Teaching Job--Murray, KY
• Apology from Murray, KY
• TW Curriculum Info, Please
• Punctuation names (catch that peeve)

Schaaf Patricia A

• On Line Documents?

Scott Browne

• Re: Idle questions - Humor (fwd)
• Re: quick Word question about ASCII text

Sean Reifschneider

• Unsubscribe

Sharon Toll

• Math & Writing
• Re: Invoke or Use
• Re: Future of Technical Writing

Shelly LaRock

• anyone there?
• Frame to HTML conversions
• Re: Math vs. writing
• Re: Make it pretty
• good bye
• For Minneap./St. Paul only!
• Re: Tech Pubs Manager Search

Sherri Hall

• students critiquing each other
• codes in subject lines

Sonina Velasquez

• Multimedia as part of a Tech. Communicator's knowledge base
• Re: Can I Have Your Opinions and Ideas on Audience?
• Re: Editing and the Internet

Steve Fouts

• Re: Background
• Re: Buying my Own Hardware (Long Reply)
• Re: video scripting
• Re: Limited Experience on Resumes
• Re: the who, the that, the forest, the trees
• Re: TECHWR-L available as newsgroup????
• Re: Mom
• Re: Punctuation names
• Re: What software are you using?
• Ashleigh Brilliant

Steven W. Leslie

• Re: Frame to HTML conversions
• Re: Looking for HTML information

Stewart Freed

• Re: binders and printing
• Book Master Information Wanted
• Book Master Replies

Stuart Selber

• Re: Use of Passive Voice
• Re: Shannon-Weaver Model

SuePStewrt

• Re: women and men (was Re: Hey, take it eas
• Re: Passive voice
• Re: Enjoy. Not tech writing.

Summers, Jan

• binders and printing
• structured writing

Susan Fowler

• Re: "Facts is facts" and IQ tests
• Re: Foreign languages a measure of intelligence?
• New Jersey/New York STC Online SIG Meeting
• Forw: Localization tools (Long)

Susan Purcell

• help, please
• Re: help, please

Tate-Stratton, Nikki A

• Re: MOM

TechWriter

• Re: Documentation Estimates

Ted Steffens

• overseas jobs

Terri Rubin

• Tech Pubs Manager Search
• A search for a manager of Technical Writing

Terry Riffey

• Re: Wordperfect 6.1
• Re: Letters and E-mail

Tharon Howard

• Job Opening at Clemson University

TimWA

• Re: structured writing (Information Mapping)

Tina Sansom

• Developing thick skin...

Tom Pearsall

• Wong
• Re Audience awareness
• passive voice

Tom Warren

• Call for Proposals: FORUM 95
• What is INTECOM
• Search Extended: OK. S.U. Dir. Tech. Writing

Tracey Showalter

• For Pierre Didierjean
• Re: Servers vs. local

Tracie Speer

• jobs in Texas or Arizona??
• Thanks and another Question
• MA in tech writing
• Re: Spoken Language Control

Trevor Grayling

• Re: Measuring Doc. Quality?

TWO LINES: the Stanford Translation Journal

• We publish translations!

Unknown

• A search for a Manager of Technical Writing

USA::MU17692

• The future of our profession & "Future Shock"
• Equipment Needs
• Idle questions-Humor
• Hardware versus Software
• What else to tech. communicators do?
• **Defining Tech Comm**
• Peter Drucker's article in the Atlantic Monthly
• Re: What Software Are You Using
• Word 6.0 and the Internet
• Shannon/Weaver & Fiber Optics
• Jobs Future for Technical Communication

USA::SOM24502

• what's in a name?
• the who, the that, the forest, the trees

Usability Expertise Center ph.603.881.2430

• Job openings: Usability Engineers at DEC (MASS and NH)

usrid

• Dave Meek: Spokesperson for Minorities???

Valerie Archambeau

• Tech Writers and the Elites (was Creativity)
• Re: Pogo yes, but...
• Built-in to vs. built in to

Vicki Rosenzweig

• Re: Letters and E-mail
• Re: "Come with," "I want to go with," and so on.
• Re: Future of Technical Writing
• Re: Hey, take it easy!
• Re: e-mail
• Re: women and men (was Re: Hey, take it eas
• Re: Is passive voice ever OK?

Virginia L. Krenn

• Synopsis: Login, Log in, Log into
• Re: Synopsis: Login, Log in, Log into
• Re[2]: We're not so bad after all, folks
• Language and Intelligence
• Re: Math vs. writing
• Re: spoken & written usage
• Re[2]: spoken & written usage
• Re: Invoke or Use
• Re: Creativity
• Re: Scientist/artists? (was Re: Creativity)
• Re: Invoke vs. Use
• Re[3]: women and men (was Re: Hey, take it easy!)
• Re: Mommmmmmmmm!
• Re[2]: Sie/hir
• Re[2]: spoken & written usage
• Re: PC Comments
• Re[2]: generic "he"
• Re: he/she

Vollbach, Elizabeth

• Please Help
• To flame or not to flame; how do you decide?
• "Come with," "I want to go with," and so on.
• Sorry

WandaJane Phillips

• SGML and cross platform help
• Re: Another Web page for tech

Watson Laughton

• Re: teaching
• PC Comments

Westra, Kayla L.

• Re: "Y'all" usage at MIT
• Re: Letters and E-mail
• Re: your mail
• Re: Letters and E-mail
• Re: Letters and E-mail
• Re: Using Style/Grammar Checker
• Equipment needs
• Re: Meetings and Classes: A Flame
• Re: Equipment needs
• Re: Math vs. writing
• Re: Math vs. writing
• Re: Grammar problem
• Re: Maths vs Writing (Long text)
• Re: Creativity
• Re: Invoke or Use
• Re: **Defining Tech Comm**
• Re: Mom
• Re: teaching/critiquing
• Re: enough already
• Re: Is passive voice ever OK?

William E. Newkirk

• Re: generic "he"

William J. Hartzer

• Re: video scripting
• Re: video scripting
• Re: video scripting
• Re: video scripting
• Re: equipment needs
• quick Word question about ASCII
• repeat messages

Yuk-Lin Ong

• hot spot?

Yves C. Munger, p.eng., M.Sc.

• Re: Built-in to vs. built in to

Yves C. Munger, p.eng., M.Sc.A.

• Re: Lurkers
• Re: Math vs. writing cont.,
• Re: Who DOES get the documentation?
• Re: Documenting HW vs SW

---

Author Index (Switch to Thread Index)

---

---

---