TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Math vs. writing, what it takes, and de-lurking
Subject:Re: Math vs. writing, what it takes, and de-lurking From:Michael Keene <MKEENE -at- UTKVX -dot- UTK -dot- EDU> Date:Thu, 10 Nov 1994 13:41:48 -0500
In the spirit of de-lurking, let me respond to three threads at once:
As to whether it takes math/science or communication ability to be good
at technical communication, I think once I get beyond saying "Both" I
come down on the side of communication. People I talk with and work with
generally seem to have found it easier to give a communicator the
math/science knowledge required to do a particular task than it is to
give a math/science specialist the communication ability. In fact, I
think both can be taught, generally in a fairly straightforward way.
What can't be taught, I think, is the "soft" skills--an attitude of
curiosity, the courage to play The Emperor's New Clothes Game ("Excuse
me, but this section here doesn't make any sense to me. Am I missing
something?"), and at least a little passion for reading and writing.
In terms of background, when I entered college (back in the evil old
post-Sputnik days of '65) I had to choose whether to do English, some
form of math/science, or music. Each was an option, although clearly at
some point I might have bombed out of any of them. I chose English not
because I loved writing (that came much later) but because I loved
reading. I came to regret giving up music and have since put in lots of
time (to no great avail) trying to make up for 25 years of just
whistling. I think the fact that I wound up in technical communication
was exactly because I was looking, albeit not consciously, for a way to
get back into the math/science world a little bit. Of course I had some
serious help from Gordon Mills and Merrill Whitburn, too.