PC Comments

Subject: PC Comments
From: Dan Lupo <dlupo -at- VNET -dot- IBM -dot- COM>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 1994 11:02:24 CST

David Meek said:

EXCERPT FOLLOWS============================================

I have read claims that sexism is responsible for relegating
"chairwoman" to relative obscurity. But I think the real answer is
that "chairman" flows better than "chairwoman." Sexism is not the
culprit. "Chairperson" is the worst-sounding of them all. Not only
that, it serves no purpose. It's hard to be gender-free when you say,
"Chairperson Sally Jones." And why would a woman *want* to hide her
gender, anyway? It's not something to be ashamed of.

The terms "womyn," "herstory," and
others are pure nonsense. Are we to change "hispanic" to "herspanic?"
How do we handle "menopause?" Does that term now refer to
hesitant Irish males? And what about "person?" Doesn't it contain
the dreaded male bias in "son?" (Oops--now there'll be a headlong
rush to obliterate "son" from every word. And then "sun," since
it sounds the same.)

If the PC-fascists try hard enough, they can eventually make
English a complete impediment to communication.


Question about paragraph one above: Are you saying that the "flow" and
"sound" of words serve as criteria for preferred usage? If so, can you
support that claim with other examples?

Question on paragraphs two and three above: Was it a calculated use of
"rush" in your post or is it just a deliciously ironic --and appropriate--
coincidence that I am perceiving?

Dan Lupo

Previous by Author: [no subject]
Next by Author: PC Comments
Previous by Thread: Re: Spoken Language Control
Next by Thread: PC Comments

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads