TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Using Style/Grammar Checker From:"Westra, Kayla L." <13718westr -at- KCPBLDG01 -dot- BV -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 8 Nov 1994 10:03:00 CST
I was appointed "official" info gatherer last year on several of these
programs to see whether or not we should use them. While many of them have
good features, the bottom line was that you still need the human touch for
editing. I have used Grammatik, and found it to be interesting. I
particularly like running the readibility tests. The actual "grammar
checker" catches about 60 percent of the errors (this number is from a
magazine article, not my analysis). From the comparison with other programs,
this is about the highest percentage achievable. If you want more details,
let me know.
Black & Veatch
13718westr -at- kcpbldg01 -dot- bv -dot- com
To: Multiple recipients of list TECHWR-L
Subject: Using Style/Grammar Checker
Date: Friday, November 04, 1994 2:00PM
Do any of you presently use an automated style and grammar checker,
such as Rightwriter or Grammatik, as part of your documentation QA
process. Do you think it is a good idea (given the limitations of some of
these packages)? And if you do know something about this, what package
do you recommend ? Thanks.