TechWhirl Sponsors

---

 

TECHWR-L Mailing List Archive November 1993

---

660 messages

Author Index (Switch to Thread Index)

---

0505EN09

• Re: oops -- mangled message
• Re: Expensive Software - CHEAP
• Re: Expensive Software - CHEAP
• Re: Expensive Software - CHEAP

78witherspoo

• Seattle STC Info.

Ad absurdum per aspera

• Re: Technical Writing vs. Marketing Writing
• Re: technical writing vs. marketing writing
• Reusable chunks (was: Relevant academic research and Ph.D.'s)
• Re: SGML, new media, and other hot issues
• Re: TQM-Is it a fad?
• Re: Times Roman 'N' Helvetica
• Re: Figures
• Deming's 14 Points
• Re: Deming's 14 Points
• Re: Ego
• Re: Science Writing
• Re: Re[2]: More personable tech writing
• Re: Most Important Programs to Learn
• Re: Where are the cheap computers?
• Re: Software version numbers
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE #153, 29 Nov 93

Al Berg

• Subscription request

Aldo Caputo

• notable notebook computer

Alexander Friedlander

• Graduate Programs

Alexandra Bernstein

• Re: Freelance desktop publishing
• Re: source edp in AZ and CO
• Re: source edp in AZ and CO
• Re: academic/industry partnerships
• Other list
• Notebook computer
• Re: page numbering -- internal references
• Re: notable notebook computer
• Re: "I, User" (re numbering schemes)
• Re: You asked for it
• Re: Append
• Re: Getting that degree

Alun Whittaker

• The hazards of a literary education
• Re: Technical Writing vs. Marketing Writing
• Re: technical writing vs. marketing writing
• Educational -v- Informative Writing
• Re: TQM or Barbie Mgmt Style
• Re: FrameMaker docs (was Re: Educational -v- Informative Writing)
• Technical -v- Technical Writing Expertise
• Re: Technical -v- Technical Writing Expertise
• Re: Technical -v- Technical Writing Expertise
• Worm Castings
• Re: Interactive Multimedia
• Re: Nettiquette Breach -v- Common Politeness
• Re: Interactive Multimedia
• Re: Jack of all trades, master of none?

Amy Dassie

• Any rhetoricians on audience analysis?

amy welden

• Re: Discourse software for the Mac

Anatole Wilson

• Technical Writing vs. Marketing Writing
• technical writing vs. marketing writing
• Technical writing and marketing writing
• tech writing vs. marketing writing
• TQM
• typefaces
• ethics of technical to marketing writing
• ethics of marketing writing
• ethics of marketing writing
• technical vs. writing experience

Andrew Davis

• Re: Address for university in US, please?
• Re: STC Bulletin Board Address?
• Re: How Much?

Andrew Shires

• Re: Gender-biased language
• Re: Gender-biased language

Ann Balaban

• Re: English for Asian readers

Arthur Comings

• Re: Minimalist Writing
• Re: "Overpriced" software
• Re: page numbering -- internal references
• Re: "I, User" (re numbering schemes)

Barbara Shwom

• Gender-biased language
• Re: Other list

Beth C. Staats

• More (questions) about learning Frame
• fairly good ain't good enough
• oops -- mangled message
• Re: Getting that degree
• Degrees and money

Binion Amerson

• STC Online Documentation Competition Committee

Bjbj

• Tech writing vs market writing

Bob Armao

• TQM Revisited

Bonni Graham

• Re: letterheads & envelopes
• Bridging the academia-industry gulf (chasm?)
• Bridging the academia-industry gulf -- opportunity?
• Re[2]: SGML, new media, and other hot issues
• TQM, or Taking my own advice
• Re: TQM
• Re: Good News! Isn't feedback great?
• Times Roman 'N' Helvetica (formerly SGML, etc.)
• Re: Typefaces discussion
• Re: Overcoming Technophobia
• Re[2]: typefaces
• Re[2]: Overcoming Technophobia
• Re: block lettering (readability)
• Re: ethics of technical to marketing writing
• Re[2]: More personable tech writing
• Re[2]: Ego
• SDSTC Meetings on Tape Series
• Re: Most Important Programs to Learn
• Re: Technical vs. writing knowledge
• Re: who is ezra shapiro?
• Re[2]: Technical vs. writing knowledge and masochists
• Re[2]: Most Important Programs to Learn
• Re[2]: Phoenix Jobs
• Re[2]: Usability -- page numbering
• Re: "I, User" (re numbering schemes)
• Re[2]: Guerrilla Job Search Tactics
• Sorry Shannon
• Re[2]: page numbering -- internal references
• Re: English for Asian readers
• Typography
• Re: Job Quest
• Re[2]: You asked for it
• Re: Technical -v- Technical Writing Expertise
• Re: Worm Castings
• Re[2]: Nettiquette Breach -v- Common Politeness
• Re: style checker

Bonnie Nestor (NESTORM -at- FEDC04 -dot- FED -dot- ORNL -dot- GOV

• Typefaces
• Re: Technical vs. writing skills

Brad Mehlenbacher

• Re: Value of a Ph.Ds.
• Re: SIGDOC and ACM
• Re: Hypercard Scripting
• Re: Technical vs. writing knowledge
• Re: academic/industry partnerships
• Re: good grad programs in tech comm
• Re: Documentation plan?

Brian Daley

• Re: Educational -v- Informative Writing
• Re: Gagger of The Day
• Customer feedback (formerly Re: Minimalist Writing)
• Re: Technical vs. writing knowledge
• Re: A little machoist antler-crashing
• Re: Technical Writing vs Knowledge
• Re: New Communications Skills?
• Re: Expensive Software - CHEAP

Brian J. Dooley

• Re: Where are the cheap computers?

Brigitte E. Niggemeyer.

• German students looking for US internship

Bruce B. Harper

• Re: Writer list

BURGAMW1

• Technical vs. writing skills

Carl Young (Lookout Mountain Communications)

• Re: technical writing vs. marketing writing
• Framer's Forum Magazine Address & Phone

Carolyn Kasky

• Looking for journal

Carrie Walljasper

• Re: TQM-Is it a fad?
• Re: Figures

CARTER HANSEN

• Re: Educational -v- Informative Writing
• Re: TQM, or Taking my own advice
• Re: Times Roman 'N' Helvetica (formerly SGML, etc.)

Chad Hill

• Rates: text, graphics, complete documents, etc.

Charles Fisher

• Frame 4 and Word/WordPerfect Output (PC)
• Re: Expensive Software - CHEAP
• Re: Usability -- page numbering
• Re: Usability -- page numbering
• Re: Software version numbers

Charles Sides

• FWD: SMTP delivery error
• FWD: SMTP delivery error
• FWD: SMTP delivery error
• FWD: SMTP delivery error

Chet W. Cady

• Re: TQM (longish)
• Contractions
• Eastern Standard Time
• Re: Best Programs to Unlearn

Christy Yoder

• Re: letterheads & envelopes
• Re: block lettering (readability)
• Most Important Programs to Learn
• Re: You asked for it

Chuck Banks

• Re: TQM-Is it a fad?
• Re: TQM
• Re: Minimalist Document Design
• Re: Indexing Online Books: Cost Effective?
• Re: Indexing Online Books: Cost Effective?
• Re: All caps - why?

Chuck Petch, Editor

• Frame to Word Perfect
• Re: Technical vs. writing knowledge
• Re: A little machoist antler-crashing
• Re: Technical vs. writing knowledge and masochists
• MA in English by correspondence?
• Re: Usability -- page numbering ?
• Re: You asked for it
• Re: Append

Concurrent Design=To Profits on Time 381-2690

• How to Plan and Cost an International Writing Project

Corinne Stefanick

• Re: Re[2]: Grad school (PhDs)
• Re: SGML, new media, and other hot issues
• Re: "man" "woman" terminology
• Re: Times Roman 'N' Helvetica (formerly SGML, etc.)
• Re: Typefaces
• Re: Ego
• Re: How Much?
• Re: source edp in AZ and CO
• Re: source edp in AZ and CO
• Re: You asked for it

DA Smith

• Re: Best Programs to Unlearn
• Re: Getting that degree (Append)

Dan Romanchik

• Tech Writing in Spanish?

Daniel John Brinegar

• Re: Q: Word vs. Frame
• Re: TQM Revisited
• Re: TQM (longish)
• Re: CAPS AREN'T JUST HARD TO READ

Dave Venzke

• Re: Minimalist Writing
• "Old" software
• "Old" Software - contacts
• Math Tricks

Dave Walker

• TQM
• Re: Gagger of The Day

David H. Roberts

• [no subject]

David Tietyen

• Minimalist Document Design
• Typeface selection
• ISO 9000

Deb Carnegie

• Setting up online help/documentation systems
• Re: FastTag
• Re: Setting up online help/documentation systems

Deb Smith

• Re: Style Sheet (Reply to various Replies)

Deborah Adair

• STC Region 7 Conference
• Re: Region 7 Conference
• Re: typefaces

Dickie Selfe

• controlled English
• internet resources

Dominique de Vet

• Metaphors

Doug Montalbano

• Re: "I, User" (re numbering schemes)

Ed Costello

• Re: Value of a Ph.Ds.

Edward Bedinger

• Re: On-line vs. online
• cmsg cancel <2bdo1m$91b -at- news -dot- u -dot- washington -dot- edu>

Edwin Putkonen

• Re: Setting up online help/documentation systems
• New Communications Skills?

Elaine M Brennan

• Re: SGML, new media, and other hot issues

Elliott C. Evans

• [no subject]
• Re: Writer listker <MType 2> <MText `'> >
• Recent Errors

Elwin McKellar

• Re: Other list

ENG396AK

• "man" "woman" terminology

Eva Thury

• Speaking of Fonts
• Re: "Old" software

Focus on 3 things: Quality, Quality, Quality

• Relevant academic research and Ph.D.'s
• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 28 Apr 1993 to 29 Apr 1993

Frank Stearns

• New Thought on Type and an Introduction

Fred M Jacobson

• Mixed-up type
• Re: SmallTalk names (was "typefaces")
• All caps - why? (was: block lettering (readability))
• Re: Topic/thread for Syntax Propellerheads?
• Re: Usability -- page numbering
• Re: Binary search (was numbering schemes)
• Re: Getting that degree
• Re: Documentation plan?

Fred Wersan

• Re: cultural differences in tech vs. market writing
• Educational -v- Informative Writing & Frame ?s
• Re: Times Roman 'N' Helvetica
• Re: Framers mailing list and bi-monthly publication
• Font v Typeface (was tr v Helv)
• Re: typefaces
• Re: Overcoming Technophobia
• Re: You asked for it

fretz

• Re: More personable tech writing
• Re: Ego
• Science Writing

gary dettmers

• Re: Educational -v- Informative Writing & Frame ?s
• Re: Most Important Programs to Learn
• Re: Most Important Programs to Learn
• Most Important Leason to Learn

Gayle Wood, ILCSO Office

• STC Illinois Chapter

George Klima

• Judging of text delivered online
• Help Texts for Windows NT
• Indexers
• Indexers
• STC head office
• Early Childhood Education

Gordon Meyer

• Publish-It

Gotlieb Carl R1478C

• Best Programs to Unlearn

Gregory=Kushmerek%AcctgMed%FIN

• CAPS AREN'T JUST HARD TO READ
• Upgrading doesn't have to be immoral
• [no subject]
• Poor Grammar vs. Nettiquette Breach

Gretchen Miller

• Re: Usability -- page numbering

Guy Haas

• Re: How Much?
• Usability -- page numbering ?
• Re: page numbering -- internal references
• Re: Usability -- page numbering

Hanna Nelson

• Re: Address for university in US, please?

HELEN E. HODGSON

• Re: Append

Helena Jerney

• Re: Indexing Online Books: Cost Effective?
• Re: How Much?

HOLLAND

• Re: Usability -- page numbering
• Re: Page numbering

Howard Kaikow

• Is there a FAQ for this newsgroup?
• Technical review for correctness/clarity
• FAQ

JACK P. SHAW

• Gagger of The Day
• Those "little boxes" are worth a fortune
• Topic/thread for Syntax Propellerheads?

Jacobs Chris

• Re: Platform Compatibility for WordPerfect
• Re: Any rhetoricians on audience analysis?
• Experience and Company Management

James Conklin

• [no subject]

Jane Torpie

• Re[2]: Grad school (PhDs)
• Smalltalk Contractor
• Re: Gagger of The Day

Janet Foltz

• Re: Technical -v- Technical Writing Expertise
• Re: Technical -v- Technical Writing Expertise

Janie Bergen

• Minimalist Document Design
• Re: Setting up online help/documentation systems
• Re: Setting up online help/documentation systems

Jeff Youngstrom

• Rates for copy editing...

Jim Gifford

• Re: Good News! Isn't feedback great?
• Re: Getting that degree

Jim Grey

• Re: page numbering -- internal references
• Re: "I, User" (re numbering schemes)
• Re: Software version numbers

Jim Porter

• style checker

Jim Regan

• Re: Bridging the academia-industry gulf (chasm?)

Joan Miles

• Figures in docs
• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 10 Nov 1993 to 11 Nov 1993
• Re: How Much?

Joan Stout

• Re: Indexing Online Books: Cost Effective?

Joe Fockler

• Re: Freelance desktop publishing

Johanna Manning

• ISO 8879 AND ISO/IEC IS10744
• Re: ISO 8879 AND ISO/IEC IS10744

John Fulmer INET

• Re: Technical writing and marketing writing
• Re: cultural differences in tech vs. market writing
• Re: block lettering (readability)
• MLA Handbook on-line

John McMullen

• Suggestions on document configuration management?

John Oriel

• Need address for Ginny Redish

John Stonehouse

• Re: good grad programs in tech comm

Jolene Galegher

• Grad Programs

Jon Huxtable

• Indexing Online Books: Cost Effective?

Joyce Hammock

• Americans with Disablities Act
• Disabilities
• Re: Expensive Software - CHEAP
• Re: Writer list
• Re: Poor Grammar vs. Nettiquette Breach
• Re: Graduate Programs

K Angelucci

• Re: Re[2]: SGML, new media, and other hot issues
• Connotations of Typeface

Karen Kay

• Re: Overcoming Technophobia
• Re: Most Important Programs to Learn
• Re: Most Important Programs to Learn
• Re: Usability -- page numbering
• Re: English for Asian readers
• Re: Getting that degree (Append)
• Documentation plan?
• Re: Documentation plan?
• Re: for NANCY BURNS: "Let's make it clear" and Copyright

Karen Steele

• Re: TQM, or Taking my own advice
• Re: Figures
• Re: TQM: Karen, tell more
• Business/Career Advice
• Re: "Overpriced" software

Kathleen Kuvinka

• Re: Best
• How Much?
• Re: How Much?

Kathleen Nosbisch

• SIGDOC notes

Kathy Barreto

• Typefaces discussion
• Re: Indexing Online Books

Kaye Sykes

• Re: Framers mailing list and bi-monthly publication

Kelly Hoffman

• Mac AVs vs. PowerPC (was: Rates: text, graphics, complete documents, etc.)
• Re: Technical and Marketing Communications
• FrameMaker docs (was Re: Educational -v- Informative Writing)
• Re: Buzzwords
• Re: Technical vs. writing knowledge
• Re: Most Important Programs to Learn
• Re: Most Important Programs to Learn
• Re: Eastern Standard Time
• Re: "Overpriced" software
• Re: Expensive Software - CHEAP
• Re: Usability -- page numbering
• Re: Usability -- page numbering
• Re: Usability -- page numbering
• Re: notable notebook computer

Ken d'Albenas

• Syntax for Pretzel Logic statements
• "I, User" (re numbering schemes)
• Re: Getting that degree (Append)

kendal stitzel

• Re: Ego/personable tech writing
• Software version numbers
• Re: Getting that degree
• Re: Typeface/Let's Make it Clear (?)

Kim Ballard

• Overcoming Technophobia
• thanks--overcome. technophobia
• Re: Poor Grammar vs. Nettiquette Breach

Kim Redick

• Re: letterheads & envelopes
• Learning abilities

Kirstin Mathers

• Experience with Publish It??

Kris Jaeger

• Technical Writing vs Knowledge

L3

• RESUME SOFTWARE

laila

• letterheads & envelopes

Larry Kunz ((919) 254-6395)

• STC Marketing Communication (MarCom) PIC
• Indexing Online Books
• STC (Metro Baltimore chapter)
• Interactive Multimedia
• Academic programs

lathropl

• Documentation plan?
• Re: Style Checker

LaVonna Funkhouser

• Re: netettique, included text
• Good News! Isn't feedback great?
• Product liability case, inadequate instructions (OK Chapter of STC)
• TQM: Karen, tell more
• "font" vs "typeface"
• block lettering (readability)
• tech comm prof job
• List produces mugs: Cool!
• page numbering -- internal references
• Re: Writer list
• arts and humanities in info superhighway
• Spelling and grammar in this list

lcjohn -at- usthk -dot- ust -dot- hk

• EFL students in a Tech communication course

Leblanc, Suzanne R

• SUBSCRIBE TECHWR-L Suzanne LeBlanc

Len Olszewski

• Re: Technical Wrinting VS. Technical Marketing
• Re: TQM, or Taking my own advice
• Re: Minimalist Writing
• Figures
• Re: More personable tech writing
• Re: Technical Writing vs Knowledge
• Re: Usability -- page numbering
• Re: Software version numbers
• Re: Technical -v- Technical Writing Expertise
• Re: Getting that degree
• Re: Documentation plan?

Less is more.

• STC Region 8 Conference (Nov. 6, 1993)

Linda Rose

• Re: page numbering -- internal references

Linda Wolf

• Re: TQM-Is it a fad?
• Re: TQM Revisited
• Re: typefaces
• Re: Times Roman 'N' Helvetica
• Disregard my msg on typefaces-it's repetitious
• Hypercard Scripting
• Re: block lettering (readability)
• Freelance desktop publishing
• Re: Freelance desktop publishing

Line (L.C.) Bisson

• Moving paper online

Liz Babcock

• Msg. to the Selfes

Lori Lathrop

• STC Region 7 Conference
• Re: Indexing Online Books: Cost Effective?
• Re: Indexing Online Books: Cost Effective?
• Re: Indexing Online Books: Cost Effective?
• Guidelines for Documenting Network Configurations

LOWE

• Phoenix Jobs

lpraderio

• Re: Bibliography/Citation Format

LYNN PERRY

• Expensive Software - CHEAP

Margaret Gerard

• Estimating
• Information Design Assoc.
• TQM and Standards (long)
• Visual mess
• Re: Suggestions on document configuration management?
• Re: Re[2]: More personable tech writing
• English for Asian readers
• Scanned Images
• Scanned Images
• Re: English for Asian readers

Marguerite Krupp

• Re: SGML, new media, and other hot issues
• Re: +Postage Due+TQM, or Taking my own advice
• Re: +Postage Due+Re: TQM, or Taking my own advice
• What did I miss?

Maria Townsley

• Re: Usability -- page numbering

Marian Harry-Young

• Re: Experience with Publish It??
• Re: Judging of text delivered online
• Re: Disabilities
• Re: Writer list
• Re: RESUME SOFTWARE

Marj Rush Hovde

• STC Bulletin Board Address?

Marjorie Schejter

• Re: Most Important Programs to Learn

Mark Hagen

• Re: Indexing Online Books: Cost Effective?
• Re: Indexing Online Books: Cost Effective?
• Re: Indexing Online Books: Cost Effective?
• Re: Indexing Online Books: Cost Effective?

Mark Levinson

• Buzzwords
• Typefaces
• Ego
• A little machoist antler-crashing
• How stay grey?
• Nouns & pronouns
• Personability
• Where are the cheap computers?
• Page numbering
• You asked for it

Mary A. Geisert

• Modular Documents

MaryEllen Read

• Re: Writer list
• Re: Indexers

Merrell, K.W. (8-294-7813)

• Append

Michael Gos

• Re: TQM Revisited
• Re: TQM Revisited

Michael McClatchey

• Re: Times Roman 'N' Helvetica (formerly SGML, etc.)
• Re: Times Roman 'N' Helvetica (formerly SGML, etc.)
• Re: Interactive Multimedia
• Jack of all trades, master of none?

Mike Beyries

• Re: Most Important Programs to Learn
• Re: English for Asian readers
• Re: style checker

Mike Hamity

• Re: Technical vs. writing knowledge

MSTSACX

• Technical and Marketing Communications
• Region 7 Conference

Nancy Burns

• Re: Figures
• Re: How Much?
• Re: Phoenix Jobs
• Re: How Much?
• Re: Eastern Standard Time
• Re: You asked for it
• Re: Professional societies
• Re: Connotations of Typeface

nancy ott

• SIGDOC and ACM

Nanette Wright

• Re: Times Roman 'N' Helvetica

nburns

• Re: Minimalist Document Design
• Re: Times Roman 'N' Helvetica

Ned Bedinger

• Re: online vs. on-line, again

Nick Lilly Tarleton State University

• Reply to Technical vs. writing knowledge
• GARBLED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Pam Tatge

• Re: Deming's 14 Points
• Re: Deming's 14 Points
• Re: Usability -- page numbering

Pat Anderson

• Font vs typeface
• Job Posting- Toronto, Ontar
• Re: Eastern Standard Time

patrick morgan

• thanks: tech wrtr/eng. resends, now more

Patrick O'Connell

• Re: Bonnie Nestor (mnj -at- ornl -dot- gov)'s message about typefaces
• Newsgroup posters, heads up!
• What about BA/BSc-level tech comm. programs?

Paul Brady 5797

• FW: Frame 4.0 Lecture...at next FUNNE meeting
• FW: Frame 4.0 Lecture...at next FUNNE meeting

Paul Goble

• Re: Indexing Online Books: Cost Effective?
• Re: Usability -- page numbering
• Re: English for Asian readers
• Re: "I, User" (re numbering schemes)

Paul Sholar

• Typeface selection is subordinate to doc design
• Typeface selection is subordinate to doc design (posting #2)

Paul Trummel

• UNIVERSITY INFORMATION/SHANNON FORD
• Typography/Readability/Legibility

Philip T. DiPeri

• Re: Smalltalk Contractor

r0mill01

• (Fwd: *C&CD*) RE: (Fwd: *C&CD*) EFL students in a Tech communication course (*TECHWR-L*) (13) (*COMP.COMP*) (11)

RACHEL ELLIS

• novice

Rahul Ravel

• Re: Technical vs. writing knowledge
• Writing vs Technical - Article
• Technical vs Writing - Article Details

Randy Allen Harris

• _JTWC_ Call for Papers (2nd post)
• Re: Science Writing
• Re: Technical vs. writing knowledge
• for NANCY BURNS: "Let's make it clear" and Copyright

randy harris

• Discourse software for the Mac
• On LINGUIST (for Amy and interested others)

REAL programmers don't document...

• Re: Word vs Frame
• Re: SIGDOC and ACM

Richard Irvine

• Re: Typefaces
• Re: Typeface Info
• Re: Typeface discussion

richard k wesson

• Re: FastTag

Robert Delius Royar

• Need help finding High School text for tech writing

Robert Hilden

• [no subject]

Robert McMillan

• Re: Technical vs. writing knowledge

Robert Royar

• [no subject]

ROY KUNKLE

• Re: Experience with Publish It??
• Re Publish It

Shannon Ford

• Address for university in US, please?
• cultural differences in tech vs. market writing
• Re: Address for university in US, please?
• Re: cultural differences in tech vs. market writing
• Re: brainstorming, industry vs. academia
• Re: Minimalist Document Design
• Re: Using contractions
• Re: A little machoist antler-crashing
• Re: Technical vs. writing knowledge and masochists
• Re: Guerrilla Job Search Tactics
• Sorry, Bonni
• Re: Technical -v- Technical Writing Expertise

Stefan Fielding-Isaacs

• Re: Figures
• Re: Overcoming Technophobia
• Re: Freelance desktop publishing
• Re: Most Important Programs to Learn
• Re: "Overpriced" software
• garyd's libelous statements

Stephen Bernhardt

• Re: Grad school (PhDs)
• Re: for Steve Bernhardt; apologies to others
• Re: Value of a Ph.Ds.
• Re: SIGDOC and ACM
• Re: Bridging the academia-industry gulf (chasm?)
• Re: Indexing Online Books: Cost Effective?
• Re: Re[2]: More personable tech writing
• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 10 Nov 1993 to 11 Nov 1993
• Re: Expensive Software - CHEAP
• academic/industry partnerships
• Re: Usability -- page numbering ?
• good grad programs in tech comm

Steve Fouts

• Total Quality Management, good business or good buzz words?
• Re: Times Roman 'N' Helvetica
• Re: Deming's 14 Points
• Re: What did I miss?
• "Old" and "Overpriced" Software
• Re: Disabilities
• Re: Seattle STC Info.
• Re: Bad grammar on the list (was Append?)
• Re: Getting that degree

Steve Pope

• Technical vs. writing knowledge
• Re: Thanks for the reply
• Best

Steven Owens

• netettique, included text
• netettique, included text
• ethics of technical to marketing writing
• ethics of marketing writing
• Visual mess
• Experience with Publish It??
• Technical vs. writing knowledge
• "Best" for technical writers
• Re: Most Important Programs to Learn
• Re[2]: More personable tech writing
• Most Important Programs to Learn
• English for Asian readers

Stuart Selber

• Address/Northeastern Univ
• Re: SGML, new media, and other hot issues
• Writing Style (was ego)

Susan Gallagher

• Re[2]: typefaces
• Re[2]: Figures
• Re[2]: SmallTalk names (was "typefaces")
• More personable tech writing
• Re: Eastern Standard Time
• Re[2]: Best Programs to Unlearn

Susan Mitchell

• Nov meeting, STC Silicon Valley Chapter
• Region 8 Conference LAST CHANCE!
• STC Silicon Valley Chapter November MeetingDON'T FORGET: YOU MUST REGISTER BY THIS THURSDAY!!!
• Re: Phoenix Jobs

Susannah Skyer

• software version numbers
• Technical -v- Technical Writing Expertise

Tamye Lyles, Technical Writer--Martin Marietta Services Inc., 301 794-9600 x151

• Re: Typefaces
• Re: How Much?
• Re: Disabilities
• Re: Disabilities
• Job Quest

Thomas Barker

• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 10 Nov 1993 to 11 Nov 1993
• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 10 Nov 1993 to 11 Nov 1993

Thomas Horton

• Tech writing vs Marketing writing (Conclusion)

Thomas Krueger

• Style Guides for Computer Manuals
• Professional societies

Tim Pera

• Re: Most Important Programs to Learn

Tim Slavin

• Re: Usability -- page numbering ?

Tracey Showalter

• Typeface Info
• Re: Times Roman 'N' Helveti
• Re: Suggestions on document
• who is ezra shapiro?

Traci Gardner

• Re: Hypercard Scripting

Unknown

• [no subject]
• [no subject]
• [no subject]
• [no subject]
• [no subject]
• [no subject]

Vandy Estrella Reppert-Berry

• Early Childhood Education
• Re: Early Childhood Education
• [no subject]
• Re: Early Childhood Education
• Re: Early Childhood Education

vanessa

• internship

Vicki Rosenzweig

• Re: SIGDOC and ACM
• Re: Gender-biased language
• Re: Most Important Programs to Learn
• Re: Gender-biased language
• Re: Usability -- page numbering
• Re: English for Asian readers
• Re: "I, User" (re numbering schemes)
• Re: Getting that degree (Append)
• Re: Getting that degree

Vladimir

• A question from Russia about funds in science

William C. Stolgitis

• How Much?
• page numbering -- internal references

YOUNG

• Re: Value of a Ph.Ds.

Young Kim

• SGML--What does it mean to us?

Yvonne deGraw

• Re: Usability -- page numbering

Z3BCG

• Looking for Tailhook Report

---

Author Index (Switch to Thread Index)

---

---

---