TechWhirl Sponsors

---

 

TECHWR-L Mailing List Archive January 1994

---

811 messages

Author Index (Switch to Thread Index)

---

Ad absurdum per aspera

• Re: What is quality?
• Deming
• Re: ACM or IEEE conference? (A Babel of Initialisms)
• Re: Season's Greetings Revisited
• EW-ED '94: Computer Tech. in Education
• Re: intuition vs. background
• Re: Funny quote
• Re: Funny quote
• Re: Marketing/propaganda in documentation
• Re: English only legislation
• Re: Instructions for Stupid People (was Allergic Reaction)
• Re: US English
• Re: nutrition or fitness and tech writing?
• Re: Homophones and perils of email format
• Re: Strange "warning"
• Re: TECHNICAL, ACADEMIC: use or not use `we'

Alan Yelvington

• Re: Trade Mark Notices
• Re: Hyper/Multi media
• Re: Marketing/propaganda in documentation
• Documentation standards for external vendors
• Re: US English
• Re: Official languages
• Re: Official languages
• Re: Writing for the avid non-reader.
• Re: ISO 9000
• Re: Writing for the avid non-reader.

Alexander Friedlander

• Degree question

Alun Whittaker

• homophones
• Re: thing

amy welden

• Citation programs

Anatole Wilson

• marketing "propaganda" in manuals
• English as the official language
• English as the official language
• Re: English Legislation

Andrea Magers

• Arrow Keys or Cursor Keys or...
• Re: another think ..uh... thing coming
• Re: Style Guides?
• Re: homophones

Andrew English

• science writing career info wanted

Andrew Shires

• Style Guides
• Re: Homophones and perils of email format
• GUI Terminology (was Re: Re[2]: Key-whacking)
• Re: Colons, lists, and periods

Ann Amsler

• Re: Origin of the AT Symbol

Ann Hill Duin

• AAHE conference
• Instructional Technology

Anna Cappello

• Alternative to FRAMEViewer

Arthur Comings

• DecWrite to MML filter
• Re: Re[4]: homophones
• Re: Generic Computer Term
• Re: Colons, lists, and periods

Barbara Rigg-Healy

• Re: Funny quote
• Using HTML
• HTML

Barbara S. Strack

• Re: ACM or IEEE conference? (A Babel of Initialisms)

belville

• Re: Degree Question

Bill Downing

• Re: Out-sourcing
• Re: your mail
• Re: Hypertext?
• Re: What is quality?

Billie Wahlstrom

• Re: Bibliography-long post
• Re: Apologies
• Re: Copyright question - Doonsbury
• Call for Papers

Binion Amerson

• STC Lone Star Chapter Winter Seminar--"Operating Your Environment"
• STC Lone Star Chapter Winter Seminar--Presentation Abstracts

Bob Armao

• Re: Style Guides?

Bonni Graham

• Re: The dangerous myth of the "completely intuitive product"
• Re: Hypertext?
• Re: Can't do without paper?
• guerrilla video
• January Video
• Re: online help (using duplicate contextual helps)
• Re: Indexing glossary entries?
• Instructions for Stupid People (was Allergic Reaction)
• Jaunary Video -- Price & Ordering
• Re[2]: More allergic reactions... How would you...?
• Re[2]: English only legislation
• Re: Caution Rewrite
• Writing Aggravations (was: Homophones)
• Re[2]: [exercise/exorcise/excise]
• Re: What to do with the journals?
• Re: Arrow Keys or Cursor Keys or...
• Re: homophones
• Re[2]: homophones
• Re[4]: homophones
• Re: Colons, lists, and periods
• Re[4]: homophones

Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD

• Re[2]: homophones, also some opinions and a question
• Re[2]: homophones

Brad Mehlenbacher

• Re: ACM SIGDOC Conference
• Re: _JTWC_ Call for Papers (2nd post)
• PLEASE IGNORE the Re: _JTWC_ message. A mistake send....

Brett E Lee-1

• Writing for the avid non-reader.
• Re: Writing for the avid non-reader.
• Re: Homophones
• Re: Key-whacking
• Job Opportunity in Minnesota
• Re: Job Opportunity in Minnesota
• Re: Re[2]: homophones
• Re: homophones
• Re: Malapropisms
• Re: homophones

Brian Daley

• Re: The dangerous myth of the "completely intuitive product"
• Re: Hypertext?
• Fuzzy Logic (formerly intuition vs. background)
• Getting Electronic Files from Drafting
• Re: Getting Electronic Files from Drafting
• Re: FrameMaker 3.x.x
• Re: Page to Frame
• Re: Across Cultures
• Re: Hyper/Multi media
• Re: What to do with the journals?
• Re: Using HTML

Brian J. Dooley

• Humour: Nocilis of Yppolf #1
• Humour: Nocilis of Yppolf #2
• Humour: Nocilis of Yppolf #3
• Humour: Nocilis of Yppolf #4
• Humour: Nocilis of Yppolf #5

BURGAMW1

• Re: Publishing a project
• Re: Degree question
• Re: Homophones
• Punctuation in lists
• Re: another think coming

Charles Cox

• [no subject]

Charles Fisher

• Thanks
• JOKE: A Famoose Soullioukwee
• Re: What is quality?
• Re: Instructions for Stupid People (was Allergic Reaction)
• Re: Seeking information
• Feb. 94 STC DC Chapter Meeting

Charles P. Campbell

• Re: (1) SIGDOC Conference; (2) authoring tools
• Re: Lost My Copy Of Ode to Spellcheckers
• Degree qualifications
• Re: Emily Post-ing
• Re: Emily Post-ing
• Homophones and perils of email format
• Re: What to do with the journals?
• Re: homophones
• Re: List punctuation and STC pubs competitions
• Re: think ..uh... thing coming (Regional)
• Another think coming
• Re: Pronouncing "gigabyte"; TAKE A STAND!

Chuck Banks

• Re: Outsourcing
• Re: Bozos
• Re: The dangerous myth of the "completely intuitive product"
• Re: (2) authoring tools
• Re: What is quality?
• Re: Estimating
• Re: Getting Electronic Files from Drafting
• Re: Funny quote
• Re: spec writing
• Re: Copyright question - Doonsbury
• Re: US English
• Re: Good magazines needed
• Re: Frame Relay Technology
• E-mail Survey
• Re: Trademark Notices/Depository Libraries
• American Society of Indexers Announcement
• Frame Relay Forum is on Internet
• WWW Internet Directory

Chuck Murray, ZK2-2/R94, DTN 381-2648 31-Jan-1994 0837

• Telecommuting

CHUCK PETCH

• Amusing line in the movie "Russia House"
• Marketing Hype

Cindy Selfe

• [no subject]
• [no subject]

Craig Haggart, Accelerator Ops

• Re: Bozos
• Re: Bozos
• Whoops! 'Scuse me!
• Re: Indexing glossary entries?
• American Heritage Dictionary

Dana MacKonis - SunSelect Information Architecture - CONTRACTOR

• Re: Homophones

dargan

• Re: Copywright question - Doonsbury

Dave Christensen

• A reply to a previous discussion

Dave Peltier

• Re: Official languages

Dave Venzke

• [no subject]
• Multi-Media Magazine
• Re: Copyright references
• [no subject]
• Generic Computer Term

David A Lowe

• Style Guides?

David McMurrey IBM

• Summary of changes in prefaces
• Quot. marks on chapter/heading titles
• Trademark notices/searches
• Trademark searches
• Not a homophone but still weird...

David Moss

• Moving LISTSERV

Dawn-Marie Oliver

• Seeking information

Dean Elzinga

• Re: Tools of choice, and tangents
• Re: [exercise/exorcise/excise]
• Re: homophones
• Re: Style Guides?
• Re: think ..uh... thing coming (Regional)
• thing

Deb Carnegie

• ACM SIGDOC Conference

Deborah Adair

• Re: US English (was Instruc
• Re: homophones

Dianne Phelan

• Re: Job Descriptions
• Re: Degree Question
• Re: Key-whacking

Dickie Selfe

• cap-l recap

Dominique de Vet

• Re: FORMS DESIGN

Don M Chaffee

• Re: Bozos
• Re: Tools of choice, and tangents
• Re: Whoops! 'Scuse me!
• Re: Win Help file sizes
• Re: Style Guides?
• Re: Style Guides?
• Re: Style Guides?
• Re: Dictionary Standard
• Pronouncing "gigabyte"; TAKE A STAND!

Donna Ellis

• Desperately Seeking Icons
• Re: Indexing glossary entries?
• Re: science writing career info wanted
• Re: Trademark Notices/Depository Libraries

doug collins

• Re: Caution Rewrite

Doug Montalbano

• Re: Hyper/Multi media
• Re: Saul Bellow
• Re: another think ..uh... thing coming
• Re: Another Homophone

Doug Osborn

• Information mapping courses?

Douglas L. Seavey

• Re: subscribe me

Dr. K. Butler-Nalin

• job position at University of Northern Iowa

Edward Bedinger

• Re: Self-study suggestions
• Re: What is quality?

ejray

• Re[2]: Forms design
• Address Info
• Rejected Posting Messages

Elaine M Brennan

• Re: Page to Frame

Elliott C. Evans

• Re: Funny Quote

Faith Weber

• Re: Can't do without paper?

Ferstel John W

• Re: Bozos
• Re: Bozos
• Re: Bozos
• Season's Greetings Revisited

Frank A. Saucier

• Telecommuting
• Will Post Results From My Telecommuting Survey

Frank Ripp, Ext 1313

• Windows Help questions

Frank Stearns

• Re: Using HTML

Fred M Jacobson

• Re: "intuitive" products/interfaces & standards
• Re: More allergic reactions... How would you...?
• Re: Key-whacking
• Re: Re[2]: homophones
• Re: Key-whacking

Fred Wersan

• Re: The dangerous myth of the "completely intuitive product"
• RTF
• Re: Caution and Warning usage in documentation
• Re: Translation, International Documents
• Re: Funny quote
• Re: Funny quote
• PowerPC
• Win Help file sizes
• Re: homophones

Gary Dettmers

• Re: Hypertext?
• Dial-in services to the net?
• Re: Key-whacking
• Re: Key-whacking
• Re: Re[2]: homophones

George Hasty

• Re: Instructions for Stupid People (and litigation)
• Re: Instructions for Stupid People (and litigation)

Gordon Meyer

• Emily Post-ing
• Emily Post-ing
• homophones
• STC competition

Gotlieb Carl R1478C

• Re: What is quality?

Gregory=Kushmerek%AcctgMed%FIN

• English only - My $.02
• What to do with the journals?
• Thanks all for recommendations

Guy Haas

• Re: homophones
• Re: think ..uh... thing coming (Regional)

Heather Atkinson

• Re: What to do with the journals?
• Re: Homophones
• Re: Using HTML

Helena Jerney

• Re: abortion
• STC Board Meeting
• Re: Official languages
• Re: US English
• Re: English as the official language
• Re: English only - My $.02

Heli Roosild

• Re: Emily Post-ing [exercise/exorcise/excise]
• Re: ISO 9000
• Re: homophones
• Re: think ..uh... thing coming (Regional)
• Re: "The system ..." [was Style Guides?]

Herman van den Bergen

• How to publish projects?

HOLLAND

• Re: Outsourcing
• Marketing-slime in user doc
• Re: Trade Mark Notices
• Re: homophones

JACK P. SHAW

• M/F terminology tai-kwan-do, ad nauseum

Jacobs Chris

• Self-study suggestions
• Quality metrics and Ode to Spellcheckers
• Re: Information mapping courses?
• Re: thin(g, k) survey

JAMES MCCORMICK - MT. ROYAL COLLEGE

• Origin of the AT Symbol

Jan E. Patterson

• Message for Carl Gotlieb
• brochure on trademark information

Jane Torpie

• Tech Weenies in the TC group (was: Job Descriptions)
• Re: Degree Question
• Re[2]: homophones

Jane_Torpie_at_III-HQ

• Re[3]: homophones
• Re: Telecommuting
• Re[2]: Telecommuting

Janet A. Kelley

• Re: think ..uh... thing coming (Regional)
• Re: thin(g, k) survey

Janie Bergen

• Re: Windows Help questions

Jeff Jungblut

• Re: authoring tools
• Re: Windows Help/Future Demand

Jerold Jeansonne

• Re: Job Opportunity in Minnesota

Jill Hietpas

• job sharing/part time/flexible work schedules

Jill R Shapiro

• Estimating
• Estimating
• spec writing

Jim Gifford

• Re: think ..uh... thing coming (Regional)
• Re: homophones
• Re: homophones

Jim Grey

• Re: Can't do without paper?
• Re: Marketing/propaganda in documentation
• Indexing glossary entries?
• Re: Trade Mark Notices
• Re: Caution Rewrite
• Re: Key-whacking
• Re: Key-whacking
• Re: Colons, lists, and periods
• [LISTSERV -at- vm1 -dot- ucc -dot- okstate -dot- edu: TECHWR-L Digest - 26 Jan 1994 to 28 Jan 1994]
• Trademarks
• Trademark Brochure

Jim Porter

• Re: FrameMaker 3.x.x
• Re: FrameMaker 3.x.x

Jim Venis

• Re: Across Cultures
• Re: Forms design
• Re: Indexing glossary entries
• Re: English only legislation
• Re: English only legislation
• Re: Emily Post-ing
• Re: Style Guides
• Re: Dictionaries

Joan Miles

• Re: abortion
• Re: thin(g, k) survey

Joe Fockler

• Re: Future Demand for Tech Writers
• Re: abortion
• Re: abortion
• Re: Summary of changes in prefaces
• Re: Page to Frame
• Re: Open Systems
• Re: Instructions for Stupid People (and litigation)
• Re: another think ..uh... thing coming

Johanna Manning

• Re: English only legislation
• Re: Re[2]: English only legislation

John Eldard

• Colons, lists, and periods
• Punctuating lists
• Re: Telecommuting

John Oriel

• Re: Joe Chew's note about official language

John Weiland

• Re: Colons, lists, and periods

Jonathan Leer

• Re: What is quality?
• Re: Outsourcing
• Re: Out-sourcing
• Re: Out-sourcing
• Re: Out-sourcing
• Re: job sharing/part time/flexible work schedules
• Re: Telecommuting
• Re: What is quality?
• Re: The dangerous myth of the "completely intuitive product"
• Re: The dangerous myth of the "completely intuitive product"
• Re: What is quality?
• Re: customer response
• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 4 Jan 1994 to 5 Jan 1994
• Future Demand for Tech Writers
• Re: Future Demand for Tech Writers
• Re: job opening
• Re: Page to Frame
• Re: Written to online?
• Re: Page to Frame
• Re: Open Systems
• Re: Copyright question - Doonsbury
• Re: Page to Frame
• Re: Embedded Indexing Software (RFC of 12/93)
• Converting Pagemaker 4.0 to 5.0
• Re: Bread and butter?
• Re: Alternative to FRAMEViewer
• Re: Jobs in Europe
• Medical Writers
• Re: ISO 9000
• Re: Writing for the avid non-reader.
• Re: Writing for the avid non-reader.
• Re: Telecommuting
• Re: Telecommuting
• Re: Telecommuting

Judith Grobe Sachs

• Re: homophones, also some opinions and a question
• Re: Generic Computer Term

Judith Wisdom

• Re: Reverse order print?
• Re: Reverse order print (fwd)
• Re: reverse order printing report (fwd)
• Re: Macro for reverse order printing
• Re: Emily Post-ing
• Re: Emily Post-ing

Julie Barker

• Re: [exercise/exorcise/excise]
• Re[2]: [exercise/exorcise/excise]

Karen Kay

• Re: English only legislation
• Re: English Legislation
• Re: Re[2]: English only legislation
• Re: Emily Post-ing
• Re: Dictionaries

Karen Steele

• Re: Outsourcing

Kathleen Nosbisch

• Re: mainframe OS term needed
• Re: science writing career info wanted
• Re: Good magazines needed

Kay Lukens

• Re: Funny quote
• Re: homophones

Kay Schimmelman

• Re: Trademark

Kaye Sykes

• Jobs in Europe
• Personal for Tammy Williams

Kelly Hoffman

• Re: Future Demand for Tech Writers
• Re: FrameMaker 3.x.x
• Re: Caution Rewrite
• Re: Key-whacking
• another think ..uh... thing coming
• Re: another think ..uh... thing coming
• Re: homophones
• Re: Using HTML

Ken d'Albenas

• Re: (1) SIGDOC Conference; (2) authoring tools
• ACM or IEEE conference? (A Babel of Initialisms)
• STC Intercom arrival - informal poll
• Re: Forms design
• Re: homophones

kendal stitzel

• Re: The dangerous myth of the "completely intuitive product"
• Re: Can't do without paper?
• Re: Funny quote
• ISO 9000

Kim Ballard

• Re: homophones
• Re: Another strange warning
• Re: homophones

Kris Jaeger

• Forms design
• Re: Trade Mark Notices
• Re: What to do with the journals?
• Re: Trademark

Kristi L Koscianski-1

• nutrition or fitness and tech writing?

kristin evenson

• Strange "warning"

L3

• Re: Lists for Professional Writing Class
• Re: cap-l recap
• Re: nutrition or fitness and tech writing?
• Re: "Press" vs "Hit"

laila

• please ignore-test!
• IBM information

Larry Kunz ((919) 254-6395)

• The dangerous myth of the "completely intuitive product"
• STC-sponsored research project: Value Added
• International technical communication

lathropl

• Re: Estimating

Laura Lemay

• Re: Job Descriptions
• Re: job sharing/part time/flexible work schedules
• Re: (1) SIGDOC Conference; (2) authoring tools
• Re: How did you get connected to the net?
• Re: Using HTML
• Re: think ..uh... thing coming

LaVonna Funkhouser

• What is Quality? A question and a comment
• Across Cultures
• Re: Indexing glossary entries?
• Allergic reaction...
• Re: More allergic reactions...
• US English (was Instructions for Stupid People)
• Re: US English
• Re: US English (was Instructions for Stupid People)
• Re: US English
• Re: English only legislation
• caution rewrite
• Caution Rewrite
• Re: US English
• Re: Re[2]: Caution Rewrite
• Re: English Legislation
• Re: Caution Rewrite
• Dictionaries (was style guides)
• Re: Writing Aggravations (was: Homophones)
• Re: Dictionaries
• Re: Dictionaries
• List punctuation and STC pubs competitions
• thing vs think
• think ..uh... thing coming (Regional)
• Re: Telecommuting
• thin(g, k) coming--Dictionary says...
• thin(g, k) survey
• Another Homophone
• Start of thin(k,g) thread

LBHONEYC

• Re: Citation programs

Leah M Nordland-1

• Bread and butter?

Lee Brasseur

• Hard drive

Lee Turner

• Re: List punctuation and STC pubs competitions

Len Olszewski

• Re: Out-sourcing
• Re: intuition vs. background
• Re: Marketing/propaganda in documentation
• Re: Allergic reaction...
• Re: US English (was Instructions for Stupid People)
• Re: Writing for the avid non-reader.
• Re: Colons, lists, and periods
• Re: homophones, also some opinions and a question
• Re: the magical appearance of dialog boxes

Less is more.

• Re: Xerox Docutech
• Invitation to Santa Barbara
• Re: Summary of changes in prefaces

Linda H. Schoenhoff

• Re: Windows Help/Future Demand

Linda Kelley

• Another strange warning

Lise Hansen

• Re: journals for students

Liz Babcock

• Re- Outsourcing
• Re- Translation, Internatio

Liz Grotte

• Re: US English

logendra (l.) naidoo

• FrameMaker 3.x.x
• Re: Alternative to FRAMEViewer
• I still love crayons.
• Thanks for the advice.
• Re: I still love crayons.
• Re: Logendra's paradox
• Re: Homophones
• [no subject]

Lori Lathrop

• More ASI Info
• Marketing/propaganda in documentation
• Re: Indexing Glossaries

lpraderio

• SIGDOC '94 Info
• How did you get connected to the net?
• Written to online?
• Re: Across Cultures
• Re: IBM information
• Tired of all Things Official
• Re: nutrition or fitness and tech writing?

Maclin, Amy

• homophones

marcia whitmore

• Position in VA for writer

Margaret Gerard

• Re: picky-picky

Margaret Redding

• Re: Can't do without paper?

Maria Townsley

• info about RTF
• Re: summary of changes
• Re: Page to Frame

Marian Harry-Young

• Lost My Copy Of Ode to Spellcheckers
• Re: Lost My Copy Of Ode to Spellcheckers
• Re: Humour: Nocilis of Yppolf #1
• East Bay STC Upcoming Programs
• Re: Style Guides?
• Re: Re[2]: homophones

Marianne Mahoney

• Re: abortion
• Apologies

Marj Rush Hovde

• Lists for Professional Writing Class
• Re: Lists for Professional Writing Class

Mark Hagen

• Re: homophones

Mark Levinson

• Out-sourcing
• Can't do without paper?
• customer response
• Marketing/propaganda
• Saul Bellow
• Accentuate the positive
• Garlic and government
• Official languages
• Emily Post-ing
• Good magazines
• Key-whacking
• Trademarks
• Nice day? No thanks, I just had one...

Marta Fortin IBM

• Re: Alternative to FRAMEViewer

Mary K. Jackman

• Re: think ..uh... thing coming (Regional)
• Re: thin(g, k) survey

Mary Massirer

• SCMLA, New Orleans

Matt Abe

• Re: Style Guides?

Matthew Wong

• Windows Help/Future Demand
• Re: Windows Help questions
• ISO 9000

mcm

• I am trying to get on the techwriters' mailing list

Melinda Massi (MHM0)

• warning: possible Internet scam
• apparently NOT a scam after all

Melody DeMeritt

• Stop the Thinking Thing

Melvin Klassen

• Re: warning: possible Internet scam
• Re: mainframe OS term needed

Michael Gos

• Re: homophones
• Re: Briticisms and Americanisms

Michael K. Christie

• Re: Quotation Marks
• Dictionaries

Michael McClatchey

• Re: English only - My $.02

Michael Spooner

• US English

Mike Beyries

• Re: Tech Weenies in the TC group (was: Job Descriptions)
• multimedia and authorware
• Re: Marketing/propaganda in documentation
• humor -- re: netiquette(s)

Mike Christie

• Re: Xerox Docutech

Mike Mcgraw

• Re: Jaunary Video -- Price & Ordering

MIR

• SGML: The Adventure Begins

Montgomery, Kevin

• Homophones (sort of)

MORRISON_T

• Re: think ..uh... thing coming

mpriestley

• online help (using duplicate contextual helps)
• different types of links, OS/2 IPF
• Re: Style Guides?
• Re: Key-whacking
• Re: thing - uh, think coming
• the magical appearance of dialog boxes

MSTSACX

• Out-sourcing
• Telecommuting
• Telecommuting Continued
• Benchmarking

NANCY

• Tech writer salaries in Austin, Texas
• More on Salary ranges

NANCY AMMAN

• Technical tongue twisters anyone?

Nancy C. Mulvany

• Embedded Indexing Software (RFC of 12/93)
• Embedded Indexing Software: Informal User Survey

Nancy Cedeno

• Copyright question - Doonsbury

Nancy Hoft

• International technical communication
• Re: Technical communication and cultural differences
• Re: STC Application
• Question on use of TM mark

nancy ott

• Job Opening - Pittsburgh, PA

Nancy S. Burns

• Job Opening - Tucson
• Re: Lost My Copy Of Ode to Spellcheckers
• Re: Summary of changes in prefaces
• Re: STC Intercom arrival - informal poll
• Re: More on Salary ranges
• Re: STC Membership
• Re: homophones

Pam Tatge

• What is quality?
• Re: Allergic reaction...
• Re: Alternative to FRAMEViewer
• Re: another think ..uh... thing coming
• Keyboard Abuse...and More

Pat Anderson

• Re: Good magazines needed
• Re: Homophones
• Re: Key-whacking

Patrick O'Connell

• Weird WinHelp behavior - anybody else seen this?
• Marketing/propaganda in documentation
• Thanks!
• All-online docs - reactions?
• You sent your subscription-related mail to the wrong address
• SIGDOC '93 attendees take note!

Patrick Pruisken

• Funny quote

Paul Brady 5797

• Caution and Warning usage in documentation
• Re: How did you get connected to the net?
• FW: Solicitation regarding next FUNNE speaker...
• Re: Summary of changes in prefaces
• Re: FrameMaker 3.x.x
• Re: Alternative to FRAMEViewer

Paul David Marvel

• Re: Across Cultures
• Re: Re[2]: English only legislation
• English Only Legislation

Paul Trummel

• Out-Sourcing
• TRS-80/PC/Mac Conversion Portocol
• Re: Origin of the AT Symbol

Paul W. Wilson

• Converting ASCII text to SGML/HTML

Peg Mauer

• Re: think ..uh... thing coming

Pertti M{kitalo

• Good magazines needed

Pochun Chan

• Re: Trade Mark Notices
• Re: Trade Mark Notices
• Re: Trademark Notices/Depository Libraries
• Re: Trade Mark Notices
• Use of TM mark
• Correction - use of TM mark

Ram Bone

• Re: Bozos
• Re: Bozos

Randy Allen Harris

• _JTWC_ Call for Papers (2nd post)
• Re: More Information from TECHWR-L Listowner
• Instructions for Stupid People (and litigation)
• Sorry, sorry, sorry
• A clarification: Canada, French and English
• Re: What to do with the journals?
• Logendra's paradox
• Technical communication and cultural differences
• Re: homophones

Richard Ells

• Re: intuition vs. background

Robert Bononno

• Re: Official languages
• Re: Style Guides?
• Re: Trade Mark Notices
• Re: International technical communication

Robin M. Foster

• subscribe me

Rod Bruce

• Re: Allergic reaction...

Roxanne L. Lewis

• Re: think ..uh... thing coming (Regional)

S. George

• Re: Re[2]: homophones

Sam Saal

• Re: Embedded Indexing Software (RFC of 12/93)

Sarah Mahoney

• Re: Future Demand for Tech Writers
• Re: Desperately Seeking Icons
• Re: Allergic reaction...
• Re: Caution Rewrite
• Re: Re[2]: Caution Rewrite
• Re: Style Guides?
• Re: More on Salary ranges
• Dictionary Standard
• Re: homophones
• Re: Key-whacking
• STC Membership
• STC Application
• Re: homophones
• Re: thin(g, k) survey

Sarah T. Harris

• Doonsbury

Scot Wingo

• Re: Alternative to FRAMEViewer

Scott George

• Re: Re[4]: homophones

Scott Yarberry

• Address problem

Shannon Ford

• Re: Self-study suggestions
• Bibliography-long post
• Re: Telecommuting
• Re: Hypertext?
• One more bit about Official languages
• OL cont.
• Re: Briticisms and Americanisms
• Re: homophones
• Re: homophones
• Re: think ..uh... thing coming (Regional)

Sharlyn D. Avina

• Re: summary of changes

Sharon Moore

• homophones

Simon North

• Hyper/Multi media
• Official Languages
• Re: ISO 9000

Stan Potts

• Re: Across Cultures
• Re: Allergic reaction...

Stan Sulkes

• un-subscribe me

Stephen Bernhardt

• Re: Multimedia conversation
• authoring tools
• Re: Homophones and perils of email format
• Re: Briticisms and Americanisms
• Re: Dictionaries
• Re: Colons, lists, and periods
• Re: Homophones
• Re: Dictionaries
• on info mapping
• Re: American Heritage Dictionary
• Re: Telecommuting

Steve Fouts

• Re: FrameMaker 3.x.x
• Open Systems
• Re: Across Cultures
• Re: What to do with the journals?
• Malapropisms
• This think, thing thing.

Steve Owens

• What is quality?
• Hypertext?
• The dangerous myth of the "completely intuitive product"
• (2) authoring tools
• Degree question (What does a technical writer need to know?)
• Translation, International Documents
• Windows Help/Future Demand
• FrameMaker 3.x.x
• Marketing/propaganda in documentation
• Alternative to FRAMEViewer
• Quot. marks on chapter/heading titles
• What to do with the journals?
• What to do with the journals?
• Re: I still love crayons.
• Key-whacking
• Re: I still love crayons.
• Keyboard Abuse...and More
• HTML
• thing

Steve Read

• Re: Written to online?

Steven Goldberg

• Frame Relay Technology

Steven Youra

• Re: Re[2]: More allergic reactions... How would you...?
• Re: Caution Rewrite

Stewart Lindsay

• Re: homophones

Stuart Selber

• Re: STC Application

Sue Lindner

• Re: US English

Sue Stewart

• Re: think ..uh... thing coming (Regional)
• Re: thin(g, k) survey
• Re: homophones

Susan B. Jones

• ACM SIGDOC'94 CALL for PARTICIPATION

Susan Fowler

• Re: Marketing/propaganda in documentation

Susan Gallagher

• Re: Degree Question
• Re: Desperately Seeking Icons
• Trade Mark Notices
• Re: Allergic reaction...
• Re[2]: Caution Rewrite
• Re: Strange "warning"
• Re[2]: Key-whacking
• Re[2]: homophones
• Re: GUI Terminology (was Re: Re[2]: Key-whacking)

Susan Mitchell

• STC-SV Chapter Meeting - January
• TW Agents in Sacramento, CA
• Re: Marketing/propaganda in documentation
• Re: Instructions for Stupid People (was Allergic Reaction)

Susan Stewart

• job opening

Susan_Gallagher_at_Enfin-SD

• Re: Origin of the AT Symbol
• Re: think v thing coming (Regional & Age Perspective)

Tammy Williams

• Reply to: Re: abortion
• Re: Trademark
• Reply to: Re: Trademark

Tamye Lyles, Technical Writer--Martin Marietta Services Inc., 301 794-9600 x151

• Re: Self-study suggestions
• To Mary Beth Raven--Others may ignore
• Re: job sharing/part time/flexible work schedules

TERESA DIANE STUBBS

• Degree Question

Thomas Barker

• marketing/propaganda in documentation

Tim Pera

• Re: English only legislation
• Re: Re[2]: English only legislation

Tina Santy

• Re: homophones

Tom Parker [Consultant]

• Re: ISO 9000

Tom Warren

• Re: What to do with the journals?

Tracey Showalter

• intuition vs. background
• intuition vs. background
• Re: Using HTML
• judas priest song

Typo? What tpyo? 04-Jan-1994 1238

• Re: What is quality?

Typo? What tpyo? 04-Jan-1994 1249

• The dangerous myth of the "completely intuitive product"

Typo? What tpyo? 05-Jan-1994 1040

• The dangerous myth of the "completely intuitive product"

Typo? What tpyo? 05-Jan-1994 1101

• What is quality?

Typo? What tpyo? 06-Jan-1994 1005

• Benchmarking (was: What is quality?)

Unknown

• [no subject]
• [no subject]

Usability Expertise Center ph.603.881.2430

• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 4 Jan 1994 to 5 Jan 1994
• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 4 Jan 1994 to 5 Jan 1994
• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 28 Apr 1993 to 29 Apr 1993
• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 20 Jan 1994 to 21 Jan 1994

Usability Expertise Center ph.603.881.2430 03-Jan-1994 1047

• Northern New England January STC meeting

Vicki Rosenzweig

• Re: Bozos
• Re: Across Cultures
• Re: US English (was Instructions for Stupid People)
• Re: Re[2]: English only legislation
• Re: homophones
• Re: Re[2]: [exercise/exorcise/excise]
• Re: homophones
• Re: think ..uh... thing coming (Regional)

Vollbach, Elizabeth

• Career Info for Andy
• Re: East Bay STC
• Re: English-only in California
• "Press" vs "Hit"

WENDY

• Re: Another strange warning

When it comes to humility, I'm the greatest. -- Bullwinkle Moose

• unsubscribe

Young

• Re: Forms design

---

Author Index (Switch to Thread Index)

---

---

---