Re: homophones

Subject: Re: homophones
From: Sarah Mahoney <smahoney -at- U -dot- WASHINGTON -dot- EDU>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 1994 08:23:18 -0800

RE: "You've got another thing coming."
I just now read the "think" version in a magazine article, and
I couldn't believe it! That is the first time I have ever seen
that version in print, and I think it's a shame it made it past
the proofreaders and editors on the magazine staff.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Sarah Mahoney, Alumni/Donor Information Systems (206) 685-8979
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA (206) 685-8911 FAX
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

On Fri, 28 Jan 1994, Heli Roosild wrote:

> Sorry, but I remember the first time I heard "another think," and know that
> "another thing" predates it. And if you think about it (:-), "think" is not
> a noun, so this version is more likely to be someone's creative play on the
> original (and more grammatical) version, rather than the other way around.

> Heli Roosild
> Network Imaging, Herndon VA
> helir -at- msmailhq -dot- netimage -dot- com


Previous by Author: STC Application
Next by Author: Re: thin(g, k) survey
Previous by Thread: Re[3]: homophones
Next by Thread: homophones


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads