TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: ADMIN: Being nice to each other From:Janet Valade <janetv -at- MAIL -dot- SYSTECH -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 7 Aug 1998 13:09:13 -0700
> The "LED" discussion, for
> example, probably could have been answered by referring the member to a
> style guide. I think some list members tend to use the list as a personal
> assistant.
>
Well, here I am, getting all defensive. As the person guilty of the crime
of not knowing the consensus on how to pronounce LED, I am confused as to
the dumbness of this. Is it because there was such an agreement on the
pronunciation? And I need a reference to the style guide that provides
guidance on the pronunciation of technical abbreviations and acronyms.
Just as a note: I learned to check such things from being on this list. I
learned to be alert for differences from a discussion we had some time ago
about SQL. I had only heard it as S-Q-L and thought that was the *only*
way. I learned on the list that both S-Q-L and Sequel are used. This is
another case in which the pronuniciation determines "a" or "an". If I had
asked how to pronounce SQL and half the answers had said use "a" and half
had said use "an", would it still be a dumb question?
Janet
> ----
> Janet Valade,
> Technical Writer, Systech Corporation, San Diego, CA
>mailto:janetv -at- systech -dot- com
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------------------------------------------
> For every complex situation, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and
> wrong.
>
> Henry Louis Mencken
>
>
>
>