TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Exponents before superscripting From:"Kristine J. Olberg" <kjolberg -at- IX -dot- NETCOM -dot- COM> Date:Sat, 5 Apr 1997 12:13:49 -0600
Both of the alternatives you suggested (1/cm**4 and 1/cm^4) are valid in
the context of programming. I have seen both of these methods used by
I have a few questions: where do you need to put this? On a user interface?
In hardcopy? In softcopy? The method you use depends on where. As another
responder suggested, you can fake a superscript by rolling the platen half
a notch to the "north." But that method won't work if you're trying to
display it on the screen.
Another question: who is the audience for this information? Is it
programmers? Math literate readers? Once again, your audience should help
dictate your method.
Another question: who is lobbying against the alternatives you suggested?
Are they other writers? Application programmers?
kris -at- olberg -dot- com
kolberg -at- actamed -dot- com
> From: Robbie Rupel <robbie -at- CMS-STL -dot- COM>
> To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject: Exponents before superscripting
> Date: Friday, April 04, 1997 3:45 PM
> I have an unusual question. Back in the "old" days when typewriters
> ruled, how were superscripts represented?
> Scenario: We need to include inverse units on an index. The denominator
> contains a superscript (integer exponent to be exact). The application
> can not handle superscripts or subscripts, so we need to find another
> way. (FYI, the interface will be changed, but not in time for this
> The following have been suggested (and have been argued against) so far:
> All of the references on my desk assume access to superscripting
> capabilities. Any suggestions or leads to a definitive answer would be
> appreciated. Thanks, and have a good weekend!
> Robbie Rupel
> Lead Technical Writer
> Computerized Medical Systems, Inc. (http://www.cms-stl.com)
> robbie -at- cms-stl -dot- com
> "Pardon me for saying so, but knowing what something isn't
> doesn't exactly tell us what something is...." -Eeyore
> TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
> to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
> to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
> Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
> browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html