TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Exponents before superscripting From:Peter Brown <pbrown -at- MKS -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 7 Apr 1997 09:14:39 -0400
> Robbie Rupel wrote:
> > Scenario: We need to include inverse units on an index. The denominator
> > contains a superscript (integer exponent to be exact). The application
> > can not handle superscripts or subscripts, so we need to find another
> > way. (FYI, the interface will be changed, but not in time for this
> > release.)
> > The following have been suggested (and have been argued against) so far:
> > 1/cm**4
> > 1/cm^4
> In mathematical contexts, a caret implies a superscript and an
> implies a subscript. Though it's not elegant, it's understood.
> Examples: x^4
> The same convention is used in mathematical typesetting packages (e.g.,
> Use of ** is particularly troublesome, since * generally implies
> Gay Reed
> ahreed -at- mail -dot- iamerica -dot- net
In programming circles, ** often implies exponents (x**4). Of course,
that notation only solves the problem in this specific case where the
superscript happens to be an exponent.
"Opinions? I've had a few. But then again, too few to mention."
Peter Brown, Technical Writer (pbrown -at- mks -dot- com)
Mortice Kern Systems Inc. (http://www.mks.com)