TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Robert Plamondon wrote:
> Pete Kloppenburg writes:
> >So here are the problems (this is where you good people come in):
> >1) I notice that almost all manuals for development tools are 7x9"
> >perfect bound. This looks sharp, but you can't lie it flat without
> >breaking the spine, and you can't flip it over. Can you tell me
> >why most companies ship perfect bound manuals instead of
> Because it looks snappier. The user takes second place, as usual.
> The 7x9" format is used because some industry leader or other used
> it -- IBM used a truly wretched 5 1/2 x 8 1/x binder format for
> the IBM PC, and everyone else in the industry (except Apple)
> mindlessly copied them. (Apple had already settled on a lay-flat
> spiral-bound format, but IBM didn't notice, and most of us
> had to live with the bulky, rings-that-snap-open-and-dump-your-
> pages-on-the-floor designs given to us by the lemmmings who
> follow industry-standard practices.
If your software and manuals happen to be shipped in boxes that assume a
7x9" manual, you *might* want to consult the marketing department before
you start changing manual sizes.
> You should design documentation for the user, for yourself, or
> both. 8.5x11" documentation is a convenient size to develop,
> since that's the size paper comes in (in this country), so it's
> easy on the writer.
So we should put the user first -- except if we feel like making the
manual 8.5x11" because "it's easy on the writer"?
"Opinions? I've had a few. But then again, too few to mention."
Peter Brown, Technical Writer (pbrown -at- mks -dot- com)
Mortice Kern Systems Inc. (http://www.mks.com)