TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: S/he discussion From:"Knox, Phebe" <pknox -at- CADMUS -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 20 Dec 1995 09:17:49 EST
Colleen Dancer says at her shop they finesse the gender
problem by using examples with people's names, and just
switching genders that way. That sounds like a good
practice, if the material lends itself to the "story"-type
of examples.
But I wanted to bring up my least favorite way of dealing
with the problem, even worse than s/he: I just read a book
in which the author simply switched pronouns every few
paragraphs. No attempt at a write-around; just referred to
psychologists, psychiatrists, etc. as "he" for awhile then
as "she" for awhile. It had the effect of my never being
able to forget about the gender/language issue and
concentrate on the subject of the book, because I was
constantly wrenched back to the issue of "fairness." I'd
recommend we don't follow that route, anyway.