RE: Browseable vs browsable?

Subject: RE: Browseable vs browsable?
From: "Kathy Bowman" <Kathy -dot- Bowman -at- saabsystems -dot- com -dot- au>
To: "Robotti, Anne (Carlin)" <ARobotti -at- CarlinGroup -dot- com>, "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:19:51 +0930

'Engageability' appeared as a label on the screen because 'Able to be
engaged' was too long to fit in the narrow pane.

Anyway, for this non-existent word we will stick with the 'gea' version.
Thanks everyone for your ideas about this.


Kath Bowman

Technical Writer
Saab Systems
21 Third Avenue
Mawson Lakes
Adelaide SA 5095
Tel: +61 8 8343 3865


WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!

Easily create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to any popular Help file format or printed documentation. Learn more at

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: Browseable vs browsable?
Next by Author: Jacqueline Keeling is unavailable
Previous by Thread: RE: Browseable vs browsable?
Next by Thread: What is Business Analysis?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads