RE: Browseable vs browsable?

Subject: RE: Browseable vs browsable?
From: "Jones, Donna" <DJones -at- zebra -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:24:31 -0500

> > I have been using the word 'engageabilty' and neither
> > nor 'engagability' exists in any dictionary I have seen. It
> > is jargon, but appropriate for the context. Which spelling do
> > you think I should use for this nonexistent word?
> Kath, use "able to be engaged." That'll learn 'em.

How about making up another new word? Engageableness! Or would that be
engagableness? Same problem. D'oh! ;-)

Is it Friday yet?


This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential, and may also be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not review, use, copy, or distribute this message. If you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply email and then delete this email.

WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!

Easily create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to any popular Help file format or printed documentation. Learn more at

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

RE: Browseable vs browsable?: From: Robotti, Anne \(Carlin\)

Previous by Author: RE: A question about evaluations
Next by Author: Feedback Tool
Previous by Thread: RE: Browseable vs browsable?
Next by Thread: RE: Browseable vs browsable?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads