TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Browseable vs browsable? From:"Kathy Bowman" <Kathy -dot- Bowman -at- saabsystems -dot- com -dot- au> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:45:25 +0930
I have been watching the 'browseable' vs 'browsable' debate with
interest.
I have been using the word 'engageabilty' and neither 'engageability'
nor 'engagability' exists in any dictionary I have seen. It is jargon,
but appropriate for the context. Which spelling do you think I should
use for this nonexistent word?
Regards,
Kath Bowman
Technical Writer
Saab Systems
21 Third Avenue
Mawson Lakes
Adelaide SA 5095
Tel: +61 8 8343 3865
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
Easily create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to any popular Help file format or printed documentation. Learn more at http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-