RE: Browseable vs browsable?

Subject: RE: Browseable vs browsable?
From: "Kathy Bowman" <Kathy -dot- Bowman -at- saabsystems -dot- com -dot- au>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:45:25 +0930

I have been watching the 'browseable' vs 'browsable' debate with

I have been using the word 'engageabilty' and neither 'engageability'
nor 'engagability' exists in any dictionary I have seen. It is jargon,
but appropriate for the context. Which spelling do you think I should
use for this nonexistent word?


Kath Bowman

Technical Writer
Saab Systems
21 Third Avenue
Mawson Lakes
Adelaide SA 5095
Tel: +61 8 8343 3865


WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!

Easily create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to any popular Help file format or printed documentation. Learn more at

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: Internships-I had a few of those
Next by Author: RE: Browseable vs browsable?
Previous by Thread: RE: Browseable vs browsable?
Next by Thread: Engageability (was Browseable vs browsable)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads