Summary: Revisions into Frame

["Jim Morgan" <Jim -dot- Morgan -at- portalplayer -dot- com>]

My apologies to you all for the weirdness put out by two of my posts
last Friday, and thanks to Meg and Keith for notifying me. I was on
travel posting through an encrypted Web server, which my IT department
tells me was the cause.

Rather than waste more bandwidth, I'll only repost the following because
it was a summary of responses:

----------------------------

My thanks to those who responded on- and off-list to my question about
methods for getting electronic revisions into Frame. The summary is that
I was correct (for once!) in thinking there is no way to do so without
all users having Frame.
 
The suggestions offered related to electronic markup, but not to direct
transfer of that markup into the Frame document. Since:

--that approach introduces a source of potential errors and additional
time costs; 
--we have not suffered the document corruption problems that some people
described in	 incorporating markup in Word; and 
--all reviewers here have Word;

I guess I'm stuck with Word. Nonetheless, it is helpful to have my
suspicions confirmed, and once again I appreciate the wisdom of the list
members.
 
Thank you,
Jim
 
Jim Morgan
Technical Communications Mgr.
PortalPlayer, Inc.
 

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Now's a great time to buy RoboHelp! You'll get SnagIt screen capture
software and a $200 onsite training voucher FREE when you buy RoboHelp
Office or RoboHelp Enterprise. Hurry, this offer expires February 28, 2002. www.ehelp.com/techwr

Have you looked at the new content on TECHWR-L lately?
See http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ and check it out.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.