TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
> From: Arthur Schweke[SMTP:tekritelist -at- hotmail -dot- com]
>
> I would use the Windows button names only. PC users outnumber MAC users
> and
> MAC users are intelligent enough to know that SAVE is the same as OK. If
> in
> doubt use a back slash.
>
This is a most interesting response from a technical writer point of view.
It seems to me--and I've been known to be wrong, believe it or not--that
Arthur thinks Mac users might be smarter than PC users. I think that's a
fascinating conclusion to come to. I can understand making a decision to
focus on Windows users since Windows has enormously more market penetration
than the Mac OS does. And as someone who has only Macintoshes at
home--though I've been using Windows at work for over two years now, I'm
quite flattered to be considered smart enough to figure out that SAVE is the
same as OK.
I'm just not sure it's true (not to mention the fact that my friends hate to
see my ego fed gratuitously).
Arthur's response, and my own reaction to it, raise the question: Are the
users of certain operating systems smarter than the users of others? How
would you rank the OS's in terms of user intelligence? (The OS's that come
to mind are--in no particular order--Mac OS, MS Windows, UNIX (which has
various flavors), and LINUX.)
I'd be interested in others reactions. I think these questions do have
implications for writing technical documentation. If nothing else, the
answers will reflect the perceptions of the respondents.