TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Cost Analysis for FrameMaker From:Karen Neeb <KNeeb -at- WINNEBAGO -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 30 Jun 1999 16:52:07 -0500
Kari,
Simon wrote:
I agree 101% with Fabien comments. Take the time to print some messages
found on
this list and give those to your super.
Karen replies,
Sorry, but I disagree. Some companies require documentation to support a
decision to change tools. Changing tools adds costs in addition to the cost
of the software: training, learning curves, changing processes. It's
reasonable for a manager to request justification for the change. I had to
perform a similar task to get our department to switch tools.
Under pressure of time and deadlines, I focused on processes and features
that would save time, and listed the advantages, disadvantages, and risks of
each tool. Make sure the analysis is balanced and fair-no need to blast the
tool they're currently using. People can get strangely attached to their
tools.
