TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Trademarks as Nouns From:Mike Christie <Michael_C2 -at- VERIFONE -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 18 Nov 1998 12:07:05 -0800
This one has been bothering me for a while now.
People in our field generally know that, to quote the International
Trademark Association (INTA),
"Trademarks Are Proper Adjectives and Should Be Followed By Generic Terms."
"Life Savers" candy
However, a previous manager of mine insisted that a trademark must always be
used as an adjective, and never as a noun, in each and every occurrence in a
user guide. This means that throughout the book I had to say:
The WhizBangDoItAll software allows you to.... or
To start the WhizBangDoItAll system do the following: or
The WhizBangDoItAll software displays the following message:
WhizBangDoItAll allows you to.... or
To start WhizBangDoItAll do the following: or
WhizBangDoItAll displays the following message:
This can make for some awkward and unnecessarily long sentences in a manual.
Now I fully understand the need to protect a trademark - to use TM or (R) on
the first occurrence, and to never to use a trademark as a plural or
possessive. But isn't this overkill? In its Media Guide the INTA says:
"As a minimum requirement, use the generic term after the trademark at least
once in each written communication and when appropriate, in broadcast
matter, preferably the first time the mark appears."
Now admittedly, we are _not_ The Media, and we _are_ employed by the
trademark owner. But it would seem like an analogous situation, since we are
writing about the product.
When I look at the FrameMaker (R) version 5.5 User Guide, I see that the
Introduction on page 1 starts out "Welcome to Adobe FrameMaker (R)..." I
further notice that the product is always referred to as "FrameMaker," and
never as "the FrameMaker software" or "the FrameMaker publishing system."
Similarly, taking a look at the WinHelp for Quick View Plus (to select a
product from a company, Inso, that no doubt is used to paying close
attention to legal issues) the product name, which in an (R), is always used
as a noun.
Does anyone have any pointers to any authoritative references on this topic?
Does the Microsoft Style Guide address this? (I don't have a copy.)