TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:FWD: Re: FW: Contractors of Questionable Ability From:"Eric J. Ray" <ejray -at- RAYCOMM -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 6 Jan 1998 11:08:05 -0700
Name withheld upon request. Please reply on list.
*************************************************
>__________________________8<_______________
>SNIP
>Basically, I don't know what to do anymore. The more I test, the more
>frustrated I become. I have covered my gluteus maximus as much as
>possible, yet I feel as if it's my fault, or, at the very least, that I
>will somehow be held responsible for this debacle.
>__________________________8<_______________
>
>Your rant is more than justified. Our company has recently acquired 4
>contractors as the result of a multi-million dollar software
>implementation, and we've been less than satisfied with their
>performances, although we have also been directed by management to stick
>with them. I love what I do and the company that I work for, and to
>have to watch contractors (who we're paying through the nose for)
>blunder their way through case after case was sickening. I was fed up,
>and decided that my own gluteus maximus was not going to be blamed for
>the failure of this high-priced project due to their incompetence. So,
>I did what any rational, calm, business-like person in a responsible
>position would never do. I lost it. I pulled my manager into a
>meeting and unloaded every gripe, bent feeling, complaint, and
>frustration I was feeling as a result of the decisions of the atomic
>geniuses with whom I was forced to work, prefacing it with a strong
>disclaimer that nothing of what I had to say was directed at him, the
>management team, or the company itself. He was floored. I think he
>knew that I had been frustrated, but didn't really understand the extent
>to which I was feeling pressure to deliver the entire package without
>flaw.
>
>What I did after that probably had the most impact. I went back to the
>original list of responsibilities (maybe in your case it would be a
>contract) that I had generated and detailed point by point how the
>contractors were or were not meeting that expectation. Since I had
>already vented my frustrations, it was fairly easy to be objective
>without pointing fingers. I met with the manager (whose gluteus maximus
>would be proverbial toast if this project failed) and showed him the
>list of deliverables the contractors had promised and how they were
>failing to do deliver them. It resulted in him asking for similar lists
>from everyone else on the team, and we found that my interpretation of
>the situation was on the mark. The list was eventually forwarded on to
>the contractor's regional manager for review. He addressed the concerns
>with them and with us, and there have been some improvements since that
>time. We're not leaping over buildings in a single bound, but the
>contractors are making more of an effort to understand our business.
>
>It's extremely difficult when you're working with incompetent
>contractors, and even more frustrating when you are the primary contact.
> I would start with your manager or management team and detail your
>expectations and equivalent frustrations (one page, bullet points that
>can be easily scanned). That way, if the project fails, they will
>already have your concerns on paper. I would definitely not donate your
>time to bailing these rocket scientists out of the holes they are
>digging for themselves. Their work will speak VOLUMES to those who have
>to use it. Ultimately, their livelihood will suffer in the long run.
>Contractors have to build their reputations off of recommendations, too.
> I hope this helps!
>