TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
What utterly amazed me in 1976 when I began my career as a technical
writer was my discovery that scarcely anyone in business could write,
especially technical writers. For me it was demoralizing. Already age
36, with a checkered background that included field engineering, I
naively believed that the key element in "Technical Writer" was
writer not "technical."
Why should it not be so? When I pick up a book, magazine, or newspaper
to read an article on a technical subject, the writer's credentials or
facility with quantum mechanics make little difference to me, if they
can't write. I am not--if I have any choice--about to waste my time
solving word riddles at the same time I am trying to understand the
subject matter.
For the same reason I refuse to let amateur mechanics fix my car,
unskilled surgeons rip open my chest, or inexperienced lawers
represent me in court, I do not want to read the writings of
non-writers, no matter how many publication tools they know;
programming languages, understood; technical disciplines, mastered;
mensa tests, passed.
Professional writers have a million tricks to gain warmth, simplicity,
economy of expression, logical development, parallel structure,
take-you-by-the-hand exposition, and technical narrative to give you
goose bumps. This is a part of the air that cultures must breathe, if
we're to survive. Quality communication is everything.
Only in "technical writing." must I endure amateurism. Here I am a
captive audience, forced to read whatever opaque, sesquipedalian,
overly academized nonsense the writer chooses to throw at me. If my
livelihood depends on knowing the subject matter I must become
inurred to all manner of verbal onslaught.
But, now, something is afoot that may shift some technical writing
paradigms--the Internet. Vast improvements in technical writing first
came with PCs and the Mac, because it moved technology from the
province of a small technical elite into the hands of ordinary,
workaday people. Is it not that, "Invention is the mother of
discovery?" Snaring a targeted reader on the Internet and impelling
him to read may be the greatest technical challenge and necessity of
all time. And technical writers--not readers- will have to make all
the adjustments.