PM vs. Quark

Subject: PM vs. Quark
From: Thom Remington <remingtf -at- ENGG-MAIL -dot- LVS -dot- DUPONT -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 1997 09:12:56 -0400

A few days ago, I casually mentioned to an acquaintance that I was doing
some freelance page makeup using PageMaker.

I thought she was going to have a hemorrhage on the spot! Removing all the
diatribe, her statement was that Quark is the industry standard, and that
*nobody* uses PageMaker any more.

I've never used Quark. The closest I've come to it is to work on a computer
that has it loaded.

So... The question is: Is my friend right? Please respond directly to me;
I'll summarize for the list.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thom Remington mailto:thomas -dot- f -dot- remington -at- usa -dot- dupont -dot- com
DuPont External Affairs
Information Design & Development
http://www.dupont.com
Speaking for myself, not for DuPont.

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Instructional Design/CBT
Next by Author: R.I.P. for certification
Previous by Thread: Re: html character set
Next by Thread: Re: PM vs. Quark


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads