TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Making group work palatable From:Janet Renze <jrenze -at- CGN -dot- ORG> Date:Tue, 3 Dec 1996 17:31:16 -0600
WOW--does this "group project" strike home with me! I always
*hated* group projects (and it seemed like every prof. wanted to do
at least one a semester during grad school) because of the reasons
In the academic world, collaboration is often a good student doing all
the work while the slackers who maneuvered to be on the good student's
team doing as little as possible. Teams are usually assigned
arbitrarily, with no real goal in mind, or based on preferences of the
Yes, students need to learn how to work together, because the work
world they're entering (or continuing to work in) usually demands collaboration.
but, I also agree with Len again--
You need to define who is going to do what, how each of the
collaborators is going to contribute, and then develop working processes ....
unless each person knows what they must contribute, the net effect
will be a frustrating project.
In defense of giving group projects, maybe part of the project could be _planning_
who does what and developing a timeline--some exercise to also work on
project management. This is one skill that was almost totally ignored
in school, but one of the most critical to possess. Too many groups
(both in and out of the academic world) flail through a project, and then
gripe afterward about who did what. Approaching the project proactively and
planning for roles and responsibilities would make the work go much