TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Comments: To: Shmuel Ben-Artzi <sba -at- NETMEDIA -dot- NET -dot- IL>
Matt and all involved in this thread:
As the person who originally posted the question, I am glad to see it
resurface. In fact, the discussion which is going on right now is one
facet of what I was looking for. The other facet is the concept of
designing documents to be viewed on screen. I was curious about the up and
down sides of (particularly vertical) scrolling. It seems that most of the
web page design that I see looks at the horizontal issue, while assuming
that the user will just scroll through as much vertical information as one
chooses to put out there.
Personally, I find vertical scrolling to be a pain, and I have attempted to
design my documents (which are NOT being published as web pages) using page
sizes and fonts which basically produce one page of information per screen.
I raised this question at a seminar recently, and there was some agreement
that, while web designers should probably consider this, most did not.
I may be wrong, but it seems to me that HTML does not allow for multiple
pages in a single file (i.e., no such thing as a page break). If that is
true, then the concept of screen sized pages creates a plethora of files,
and I could certainly understand an avoidance of that.
In any case, thanks to you all for another informative discussion.
Tom <<Tom -dot- Tomasovic -at- NATWEST-PLC-NY -dot- nwmarkets -dot- com>>
You should be aware that the information contained within this message is
solely the opinion of the writer (me). The people at NatWest have little
control over how I express myself, and they should not be held responsible
for anything I say (unless, of course, I express it as a corporate