TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Comments: To: svictor -at- HOUSTON -dot- GEOQUEST -dot- SLB -dot- COM
Beth et al:
One more vote for indented bullet lists.
Second choice would be flush bullets. (These are particularly useful where
there is no initial paragraph from which to indent, a situation I have,
unfortunately, run into in the course of my work. On the other hand, if
there is no initial paragraph, who is to say whether the bullets are
indented, flush, or outdented ;-))
Tom <<Tom -dot- Tomasovic -at- NATWEST-PLC-NY -dot- nwmarkets -dot- com>>
You should be aware that the information contained within this message is solely
the opinion of the writer (me). The people at NatWest have little control over
how I express myself, and they should not be held responsible for anything I say
(unless, of course, I express it as a corporate opinion).
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Extended lists [Ref:C443970]
Author: INTERNET TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU at Multimessage
Date: 12/2/96 7:31 PM
At 12:55 PM 12/2/96 -0600, Stephen Victor wrote:
>Beth Mazur wrote:
>> I'm very sorry that I'm unable to make myself more clear! I did not mean
>> to suggest that there would be lists within lists. Rather, I wanted to
>> show three types of list items in as short a space as possible.
>Sorry, I must be dense today. If your question has been answered to your
>satisfaction, there's no point in perpetuating this thread. However, I'm
>still puzzled about the need for three different bullet indentations.
I do not need three different bullet indentations. I am trying to choose
the most readable bullet indentation of the three I have shown (outdent,
flush with left margin, *or* indent). I only want one of those three in
our documentation--the question is which one.
I am partial to indented bullet/enumeration lists. They seem to be the
most common type. Our graphic designers seem to prefer the outdent for
"design" reasons. However, I believe that type to be the most unreadable.
I was simply looking for feedback to either support or contradict my position.