TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:FrameMaker vs. Interleaf From:Karen Mayer <Karen_Mayer -dot- TOUCH_TECHNOLOGY -at- NOTES -dot- COMPUSERVE -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 15 Jun 1995 12:34:54 EDT
There are two tech writers in our small company, and right now we're
stuck having to use Word. We are submitting a proposal for a real
publishing system, and both of us have extensive experience using
Interleaf. We hear, though, that FrameMaker is a comparable product, but
neither of us knows anyone with experience using both systems.
Does anyone out there in TWland have experience with both Interleaf and
Frame? How would you compare the two in terms of efficiency of use,
portability of files, cost, system resource requirements, etc.?
