Re[2]: Robo-Help

Subject: Re[2]: Robo-Help
From: Thomas Burgin <Thomas -dot- Burgin -at- MAILPORT -dot- DELTA-AIR -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 9 May 1995 13:00:00 -0400

Message authorized by:
: Stephaniex_goble -at- CCM -dot- CH -dot- INTEL -dot- COM_at_smtp at MAILPORT


Were you using RoboHelp 3.0?

______________________________ Reply Separator
Subject: Re: Robo-Help
Author: TECHWR-L -at- VM1 -dot- ucc -dot- okstate -dot- edu_at_smtp at MAILPORT
Date: 5/1/95 3:23 PM

Comments: Warning -- original Sender: tag was news -at- BUBBA -dot- UCC -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU

Comments: To: techwr-l -at- vm1 -dot- ucc -dot- okstate -dot- edu

Tracie Speer <traspeer -at- rs6000 -dot- cmp -dot- ilstu -dot- edu> wrote:

> I'm wondering if anyone has used the Robo-Help program and could provide
> any information about it. I'm interested in determining when you would
> the program, how difficult it is to learn and how predictable is the
> program.

> Thank you for your input.

> Tracie

Tracie -
I have used it lightly: it is useful for small-scale projects where
you are creating all-new documents. It FORCES you to write its way,
which drove me nuts. It has a hard time with long help files.

Doc-to-Help is better if you are converting existing material, and
handles large help files better than RoboHelp.


Previous by Author: Familiar with HelpBreeze?
Next by Author: Re: html editors
Previous by Thread: Re[2]: Robo-Help
Next by Thread: PowerPoint to .GIF

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads