TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I'm just back from two weeks' vacation. I posted two queries before
I left; I'll now summarize responses.
This post summarizes responses to the complaint I made about lengthy
posts, usually about conferences and such. I prefer such posts to be
sharply abridged, and include an address to query for more information.
I received nine responses, via E-mail and post to techwr-l. This tells
me that most of you aren't concerned by this problem. Of the responses,
seven agree with me, and two do not. Most who agreed echoed my sentiments,
so I won't repost them. Here are the dissentions:
John Gough (john -at- atrium -dot- com):
>Strongly disagree. One of the advantages of the net is access
>without bureacracy. Also, nonprofits should not have to fund
>the overhead of multiple queries--they're stretched pretty
>thin as it is.
Nora Merhar (merhar -at- ALENA -dot- CORP -dot- ROCKWELL -dot- COM):
>I'm afraid I'm a dissenter here--I _like_ the long posts. My system shows
>each individual e-mail and where it's from, so I can see how long each one is,
>and if I think it's too long to read and respond to immediately, I print it
>out and save it to read for later (I'm on another list, by the way, where
>the postings sometimes run to a thousand or more lines, and are often
>in Estonian! Does anybody out there know a good Estonian dictionary? Or
>maybe would like to translate for me?) Anyway, I like to have all the
>information at once.
Thanks also to:
Cindy Hollingsworth (CHOLLING -at- indycms -dot- iupui -dot- edu)
Dianne Driskell (ddriskel -at- cs -dot- utexas -dot- edu)
Julie Gephart (jm_gephart -at- pnl -dot- gov)
David Bergart (bodafu -at- ccvax -dot- sinica -dot- edu -dot- tw)
Charles Sides (csides -at- fscvax -dot- fsc -dot- mass -dot- edu)
Sue Stewart (suepstewrt -at- aol -dot- com)
Marilynne Smith (m -dot- smith182 -at- GENIE -dot- GEIS -dot- COM)
These aren't enough data points, and don't represent a strong enough
interest in the issue, for me to recommend a change. I hope, though,
that those of you who might post conference info or calls for papers
will consider posting general information and listing an address for
details.
Thanks,
jim grey
--
jim grey |"Ain't nothin' better in the world, you know
jwg -at- acd4 -dot- acd -dot- com |Than lyin' in the sun, listenin' to the radio" - D. Boone
jimgrey -at- delphi -dot- com|GO/M d p+ c++(-) l u+ e- m*@ s+/ n+ h f++ g- w+@ t+ r- y+(*)
|ACD, Terre Haute, IN -- The Silicon Cornfield