TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I claim there ain't no such beast as Janet Foltz's dreamed-of "Do-All-And-
End-All Style Guide (tm)".
I have a number of writing references on my shelf:
o Warriner's English Grammar and Composition, Complete Course
I use this guy more than anything else. It's copyrighted 1957!
There are more recent versions; they're all basically the same. This
was my mom's in high school; she was apparently dating someone named
Ricky then, because his name and little hearts are pencilled in the
margins.
o The Beacon Handbook, by Robert Perrin, a professor at Indiana State
University here in Terre Haute. Tries to be a modern-day Warriner, but
is too liberal for my taste. It was free; what the hey. It has also
once or twice been the only source for an answer.
o The New York Times Manual of Style and Usage. Part of the 3-free-books
deal from the Quality Paperback Club.
o The Elements of Style / The Elements of Grammar / The Elements of
Editing. Counted as 1 book in the QPB freebie deal.
o Writing Better Computer User Documentation v2.0, by John Brockmann.
The first version was the text in my one (1) tech writing class I took
in college; I liked it so much I bought the next version when it came
out.
I also used to have this book called something like The Gregg Secretary's
Reference, which listed all kinds of typing conventions and corporate
usage conventions and such. I lent it to someone, I forget who, and now
it's gone. That book, when I got it, answered a long-burning question in
the department about whether to use a comma after the company's Inc. in
a sentence. "X, Inc., reserves... or X, Inc. reserves... -- turns out
because there's a comma after X, one's needed after Inc. When a company
uses no comma after X, none is needed after Inc. *Nowhere* else have I
seen anything like that.
So I am always looking for another reference that tells me something more
than the references already on my shelf. I especially like it when multiple
sources have slightly-out-of-phase opinions, because then I'm free to do
it the way I like best! :)
I looked, by the way, and none of my references say anything about
annotated bibliographies, either. Lots about bibliographies in general,
but nary a word about the annotated variety. Wouldn't know one if I hit
one with my car.
jim grey |beebeebumbleandthestingersmottthehoopleraycharlessingers
jwg -at- acd4 -dot- acd -dot- com |lonniemackandtwangandeddiehere'smyringwe'regoingsteadyta
GO/M d p+ c++(-) l u+ e- m*@ s+/ n+ h f++ g- w+@ t+ r- y+(*)
Terre Haute, IN -- The Silicon Cornfield