TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
But I would also point out that a lot of the research that has been done is
itself affected by document-thinking, which is what leads to the kinds of
statistics we were discussing earlier, such as the one about readers who
follow links not coming back to page they were on. It is only document-think
bias that makes any think that that is a significant statistic.
There are a great many studies which attempt to assess the impact of links
by testing comprehension of a single page. But this is clearly
document-biased. It assumes that the point of reading a document is to
comprehend the document. That is a classic idea in western education, but it
is silly in both technical communication terms and hypertext terms. The
point if for the reader to satisfy their own information need, which may be
quite specific and individual and may not require reading the whole of any
document, let alone being able to ask comprehension questions about it.
But there are times when you have to look past the academic studies and look
at the biggest Petri dishes of them all, the Web and the marketplace.
Academia seldom leads in these areas. It often takes it a long time to catch
up and figure out why the stuff that is working is working. Academic careers
and academic thinking are still very heavily book based, and this naturally
affects how academics think about communication issues and how they test
idea in communication. Open notebook science is starting to teach the
academy to think in hypertext terms, but there is still a long way to go for
the academy generally to catch up with the rest of the world.
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Janoff, Steven [mailto:Steven -dot- Janoff -at- hologic -dot- com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 2:25 PM
To: mbaker -at- analecta -dot- com; techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: RE: inline links (Re: Online help access question)
Thanks, Mark.
Actually I meant scholarly papers and research studies observing and
documenting user behavior in this area.
Example: There's a great deal of research on effectiveness of screen
captures in documentation (especially software doc), per van der Meij,
Gellevij, etc.
Looking for something comparable in the area of inline links in hypertext
(especially post-2000).
I don't recall seeing those references in the EPPO book but it's been some
time.
Thanks,
Steve
On Tuesday, October 04, 2016 11:14 AM, Mark Baker wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Janoff, Steven [mailto:Steven -dot- Janoff -at- hologic -dot- com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 1:58 PM
To: mbaker -at- analecta -dot- com; techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: RE: inline links (Re: Online help access question)
I haven't had a chance to follow this interesting discussion, but is there
any research on this?
It also seems to be something from the UX field so I would think they've
explored this at least a little.
I'd be interested in seeing any citations of good research.
Thanks,
Steve
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com