TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Thanks! (was Re: Possessive form of name ending with apostrophe?)
Subject:Re: Thanks! (was Re: Possessive form of name ending with apostrophe?) From:Kate Schneider <kateschneider42 -at- gmail -dot- com> To:Jay L Gordon <jaylgordon -at- gmail -dot- com> Date:Sat, 7 Mar 2015 08:58:39 -0800
For some visual separation, rather than using a double apostrophe, could
the student try using a single straight quote (or a prime or whatever the
opposite of a grave accent is; I'm sure both of these options are in the
character map), followed by the curly apostrophe? It might not be
technically correct, but it would be a little easier to distinguish that it
isn't a misplaced closed quotation mark.
Kate
On Saturday, March 7, 2015, Jay L Gordon <jaylgordon -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> Thanks, folks, for your ideas. I'm going to suggest to Joe, the student,
> the following approach:
>
> 1. Even though we may *think* the use of the apostrophe at the end of
> these names is a mistake somebody made at some point, we have no practical
> way of pursuing that question. If the name is spelled by the "namee" (or
> his/her parents) with an apostrophe at the end, we just have to go with
> that.
>
> 2. For the possessive form of the name, if we can't rewrite the sentence
> to avoid it, then yes, we use two apostrophes (Achante''s books and
> pencils). Like Rebecca Officer said, it may *look* wrong, but that doesn't
> really matter. Adding apostrophe-s is the way to go, if we're being
> consistent with how we make other names possessive.
>
> Thanks! I know these was sort of an odd little question, but I we were
> really stumped.
>
> --
> Jay L Gordon
> Sent with Airmail
>
> On March 6, 2015 at 8:07:19 PM, Peter Neilson (neilson -at- windstream -dot- net
> <javascript:;>) wrote:
>
> On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 18:37:14 -0500, Robert Lauriston
> <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > Clearly the possessive of Achante' should be Achante"s.
>
> Did the parents think they were spelling Enchanté or perhaps Enchantée?
>
> The apostrophe is probably used instead of the accent because school
> systems and birth registries do not have (or formerly did not have)
> equipment to handle diacritical marks.
>
> When I run across names that are clearly supposed to be something intended
> to appear French, I am -so- tempted to "correct" them into real French.
>
> I think the temptation comes not only from my tech-writing hat, but from
> my early training in proofreading for the family newspaper. For anyone who
> wonders, "Press time is two AM!" is a much more important consideration
> than, "I have to fix another typo."
>
> As for made-up names, most of know someone with a name that was modified
> at immigration, as was Dan* Goldstein**'s
>
> *made up several thousand years ago
> **made up centuries ago, I guess; my great-grandfather adopted this name
> when he got to New York, to replace "Brzóza"
>
> The name Brzóza is a place in Poland. Nobody knows how to pronounce it.
> Well, at least I don't. Mssng wvvls.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Adobe TCS 5: Get the Best of both worlds: modern publishing and best in
> class XML \ DITA authoring | http://adobe.ly/scpwfT
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as jaylgordon -at- gmail -dot- com
> <javascript:;>.
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com <javascript:;>
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com <javascript:;>. Visit
>http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Adobe TCS 5: Get the Best of both worlds: modern publishing and best in
> class XML \ DITA authoring | http://adobe.ly/scpwfT
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as kateschneider42 -at- gmail -dot- com
> <javascript:;>.
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com <javascript:;>
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com <javascript:;>. Visit
>http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>
--
Kate Schneider
Cell: 619-218-6243
Email: kateschneider42 -at- gmail -dot- com
www.linkedin.com/in/kateschneider/
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Adobe TCS 5: Get the Best of both worlds: modern publishing and best in class XML \ DITA authoring | http://adobe.ly/scpwfT