TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: Faster watermarker for PDFs -- and the compression suggestion
Subject:RE: Faster watermarker for PDFs -- and the compression suggestion From:"Pinkham, Jim" <Jim -dot- Pinkham -at- voith -dot- com> To:"Dan Goldstein" <DGoldstein -at- riverainmedical -dot- com>, <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:39:39 -0500
I tried the compression app and was less than impressed: It took a 53 MB
file and squeezed it down to 49 MB, and took a 4 MB file and
"compressed" it to 4.5 MB. So far I'm having better luck with Adobe's
native PDF compression feature.
-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+jim -dot- pinkham=voith -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
[mailto:techwr-l-bounces+jim -dot- pinkham=voith -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On
Behalf Of Dan Goldstein
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 3:21 PM
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: RE: Faster watermarker for PDFs
Hi Sue,
Watermarking the source doc would be faster. However, in this case, the
PDF comes directly from an archive of active documents in PDF format,
gets watermarked, and goes directly to an archive of obsolete documents.
Source doc doesn't get accessed during this operation.
I'll let you know after I try the apps that Seb recommended earlier
today.
Thanks,
Dan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Susan W Gallagher
> Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 4:15 PM
> To: Dan Goldstein
> Cc: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: Re: Faster watermarker for PDFs
>
> What kind of document are you generating the pdf from? If Word, you
> can use Word's Watermark feature. If Frame, you can add the watermark
> to the master page(s). Either way should be faster than letting
> Acrobat do it.
>
This message contains confidential information intended only for the use
of the addressee(s). If you are not the addressee, or the person
responsible for delivering it to the addressee, you are hereby notified
that reading, disseminating, distributing, copying, electronic storing
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this message
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message by mistake,
please notify us, by replying to the sender, and delete the original
message immediately thereafter. Thank you.
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats
or printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista &
2007 Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as Jim -dot- Pinkham -at- voith -dot- com -dot-
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-