Re: Visual representation of Active Server Pages

Subject: Re: Visual representation of Active Server Pages
From: David Neeley <dbneeley -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 17:15:28 -0600


Regarding vendor lock-in...are you folks familiar with Mono?
http://www.mono-project.com/Main_Page

With it, you can run on non-Microsoft servers, if you wish.

David




On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 14:58:53 -0500, Lou Quillio <quillio -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:

>
> With .NET, better keep the checkbook out.
>
> LQ
>

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT - EDIT AND REVIEW, REDEFINED
Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo:
http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

References:
Re: Visual representation of Active Server Pages: From: John Posada
Re: Visual representation of Active Server Pages: From: Lou Quillio

Previous by Author: Re: STC members in Ukraine
Next by Author: Re: Technical Writing - What's the catch?
Previous by Thread: Re: Visual representation of Active Server Pages
Next by Thread: Re: Visual representation of Active Server Pages


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads