Re: Visual representation of Active Server Pages

Subject: Re: Visual representation of Active Server Pages
From: Lou Quillio <quillio -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:30:32 -0500


On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 17:15:28 -0600, David Neeley <dbneeley -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:

> Regarding vendor lock-in...are you folks familiar with Mono?
> http://www.mono-project.com/Main_Page
> With it, you can run on non-Microsoft servers, if you wish.

I run it locally on Ubuntu Debian, mostly just to take a look. Ain't
it great, though, that no matter what they try, FOSS smacks it down.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foss

But most Microsoft shops will just pay M$ ... for the support, or
something. Right. FUD pays.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FUD

LQ

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT - EDIT AND REVIEW, REDEFINED
Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo:
http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
Re: Visual representation of Active Server Pages: From: John Posada
Re: Visual representation of Active Server Pages: From: Lou Quillio
Re: Visual representation of Active Server Pages: From: David Neeley

Previous by Author: Re: Generic and device specific docs
Next by Author: Re: Technical Writing - What's the catch?
Previous by Thread: Re: Visual representation of Active Server Pages
Next by Thread: HAT Evangelism


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads