TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: The End Of Technical Writing Was RE: Re: a different resume red flag
Subject:Re: The End Of Technical Writing Was RE: Re: a different resume red flag From:Dick Margulis <margulisd -at- comcast -dot- net> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:20:55 -0400
I was talking to a carpenter the other day--a skilled craftsman who has
framed and finished houses singlehandedly--and the subject of tools came
up. He said to me, "Y'know, I'm just so frustrated these days. I have to
spend all day long using tools. I never get to do any _real_ carpentry
anymore."
Okay, no, I wasn't talking to a carpenter the other day. I just made
that up. No carpenter I've ever known would make such an assertion.
And I wouldn't hire a carpenter who touted his ability to calculate the
best way to cut materials to minimize waste but then couldn't operate a
saw accurately enough to execute based on his calculations. I look for a
carpenter who can interpret drawings, minimize waste, select the right
tools for the job, and operate tools accurately and effectively.
When people go on and on around here protesting that they shouldn't have
to waste their time learning to use tools well, I get the sense they're
mostly trying to rationalize their lack of aptitude for tools. I say
there's plenty of room for people whose talents lie in other directions
(just as I wouldn't insist that an architect be able to build what she
draws). As I've said before, division of labor is a good thing. But I'd
be a lot more comfortable if instead of denigrating the importance of
tools, these whiners just said, "Y'know, I'm not particularly interested
in mastering that tool and I'm happy to have someone else do that part
of the job while I concentrate on what I do well. Between us we can do
great work." The key is mutual respect and cooperation.
Maybe (just maybe) someone who only writes and doesn't produce finished
documents is worth more per hour than someone who has straw for brains
when it comes to analysis and organization but is a real whiz at
production. But I don't think either is as valuable as someone who does
both pretty well. So instead of the constant smug denigration of
tool-users (don't forget that tool use has a lot to do with what defines
us human), it might be more lucrative to drop the negative attitude and
try to learn a little more about the _rest_ of the job.
ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl
WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.