Re: The End Of Technical Writing Was RE: Re: a different resume red flag

[TechComm Dood <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com>]

I can't tell if your joking or serious. I hope you're joking. The
tools aspect of our job is and should be small. If you're spending
hours upon hours a day tweaking in your tools, the problem is that
you're either not using them right or are using the wrong tools. The
focus of our activities should be in developing (writing) usable
documentation for our customers. The tools available to us to aid our
writing and publishing processes are many and varied because there are
many different needs depending on what you're doing. The right fit
should yeild minimum impact on the work day and the work load.


On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 08:25:39 -0700 (PDT), Tony Markos
<ajmarkos -at- yahoo -dot- com> wrote:
> 
> Its a production problem.  There is a ton of user
> friendly documentation in process, but we just can't
> crank out finished product fast enough.  We need more
> tool experts!

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l 

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.