RE: Previous employer contacts

Subject: RE: Previous employer contacts
From: Suzanne -dot- Cole -at- pattersondental -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:01:43 -0500






"If you didn't have a problem with them performing various background
checks on you after you get hired, why would you have a problem with
them performing these checks before you get hired? It doesn't make sense
from a company's perspective to do background checks on a prospective
employee after they have been hired."

That's true. It also doesn't make sense for them to run the checks on
everyone before they're even considered to be applicants. That's expensive.
It would make more sense to screen out people based on qualifications
first, then run the background and drug screening only on those who might
be legitimate candidates.


-- Suzanne Cole


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: Selecting leaders (was: Previous employer contacts)
Next by Author: Re: Selecting leaders (was: Previous employer contacts)
Previous by Thread: RE: Previous employer contacts
Next by Thread: RE: Previous employer contacts


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads