RE: ADMIN: An Open Letter to the TECHWR-L Community

Subject: RE: ADMIN: An Open Letter to the TECHWR-L Community
From: "Downing, David" <DavidDowning -at- Users -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 09:33:03 -0400


There are two other questions I might add to the survey:

1. Would your willingness to pay that $20 depend on the how you were
required to do it. For example, some people might think it was no big
deal to give their credit card number, but would want to take the
trouble to mail a check. Others might PREFER to mail a check because
they wouldn't want to risk sending their credit card number.

2. Would somebody be willing to handle the collection and processing of
the fee?

-----Original Message-----
From: Dick Margulis [mailto:margulisd -at- comcast -dot- net]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 9:16 AM
To: Downing, David
Cc: TECHWR-L
Subject: Re: ADMIN: An Open Letter to the TECHWR-L Community




Downing, David wrote:
> Something like $20/year wouldn't be a big deal, but
> $20 a MONTH might be a problem.
>
>

Okay, this reprises a figure I tossed out a couple of days ago, with the

idea that lurking would be free, but posting and voting (in a new
non-profit set up for the purpose) would require annual dues of $20.

Does anyone have a suggestion of how to test the feasiblity of such a
fee? That is, I know Deb could post it as a techwr-l poll, but that
doesn't really produce statistically valid results, especially where
people's pocketbooks are concerned. What I really want to know is how
many different individuals typically post in a given year and what
percentage of them would actually cough up $20 for the privilege of
remaining in the techwr-l community.

If you have a notion of a way to arrive at reasonably reliable numbers,
or if you want to take on the responsibility for conducting a valid
survey, please speak up.

Please do NOT just respond with "Yes, I'd pay $20." Wait for the
resulting survey.

Dick

_____________________________________________________________________________________
Attention:
The information contained in this message and or attachments is intended
only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon,
this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient
is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and
delete the material from any system and destroy any copies.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
This email message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared
by NetIQ MailMarshal
_____________________________________________________________________________________

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: RE: ADMIN: An Open Letter to the TECHWR-L Community
Next by Author: RE: ADMIN: An Open Letter to the TECHWR-L Community
Previous by Thread: Re: ADMIN: An Open Letter to the TECHWR-L Community
Next by Thread: RE: ADMIN: An Open Letter to the TECHWR-L Community


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads