[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Author Index (this month)][Thread Index (this month)][Top of Archive]

Re: TECHWRLing vs. techwriting

Subject: Re: TECHWRLing vs. techwriting
From: "Diane Evans" <diane_evans -at- hotmail -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 09:17:42 -0800

I would also like to know how do the regulars manage
both i.e. TECHWRLing and techwriting????

As others have stated, I do not use my business email account for this list. I check the list two or three times a day; sometimes more if there is an interesting thread.

If the subject doesn't mean much to me, I ignore the whole thread. I don't use FrameMaker at work, so don't have the latest and greatest knowledge on that subject. I'm very good at Word, but most of what I can say on the subject is already in the archives.

I never get involved in the heated tools debates, especially when there are 50 posts already on the subject.

If there is a thread that I feel really needs my input (like the subject of software development life cycle documentation), I will put out a quick post. I seldom put out a message that takes me more than a minute or two to write.

Of course, I am a sucker for "Friday Silliness."


Diane Evans
Technical Writer

Washington State Coordinator, Tombstone Project
http://www.rootsweb.com/~cemetery/washing.html

_________________________________________________________________
Make your home warm and cozy this winter with tips from MSN House & Home. http://special.msn.com/home/warmhome.armx




Previous by Author: How to continue caption numbering when document is split into multiple files
Next by Author: RE: Best technical writing of the season
Previous by Thread: Re: TECHWRLing vs. techwriting
Next by Thread: Re: TECHWRLing vs. techwriting

[Top of Archive] | [Author Index (this month)] | [Thread Index (this month)]

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads