RE: ADMIN: Civility and content

Subject: RE: ADMIN: Civility and content
From: "Bill Swallow" <wswallow -at- nycap -dot- rr -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 11:09:32 -0400


Well, for every person who may actually *be* out of line, there are usually
3-5 others who overreact to or misread a post. I don't find the need to
police a list ridiculous. I find people's intolerance and defensiveness more
ridiculous than anything else.

Bill Swallow
wswallow -at- nycap -dot- rr -dot- com


::: -----Original Message-----
::: It's ridiculous that a group of professionals needs to be
::: policed to make sure we behave. There should be some
::: acceptance of our differences, and a focus on our common goals.



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ANNOUNCING ROBOHELP STUDIO
Create professional Help systems that feature interactive tutorials and
demos with all new RoboHelp Studio. More at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l2

Mercer University's online MS Program in Technical Communication Management:
Preparing leaders of tomorrow's technical communication organizations today.
See www.mercer.edu/mstco or write George Hayhoe at hayhoe_g -at- mercer -dot- edu -dot-

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

References:
RE: ADMIN: Civility and content: From: Suzette

Previous by Author: RE: Two kinds of people theory
Next by Author: RE: The saga ended (or is it continuing? (was Re: A sticky contractor situation: no pay yet?)
Previous by Thread: RE: ADMIN: Civility and content
Next by Thread: RE: ADMIN: Civility and content


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads