Re: "After-the-fact" revision marking.......(Microsoft Word)

[Peter <pnewman1 -at- home -dot- com>]

Doug Grossman wrote:
> 
> Linda,
> 
> You're correct.
> 
> It wasn't about sticking it to anyone, or rubbing anyone's nose in it.  As a matter of fact, it was a non-writer who wrote it.  He's never going to hear from me about how awful his writing was (after all, if his writing *were* any good, there would be less necessity for me!).  I wanted the revision marking to show some of our newer writers what they might be up against sometimes when they need to edit some of this stuff.
> 
> I already told all of the above to Peter in an offline e-mail.  Thanks for coming to my defense.
> 

Then I misread your post.
BTW I had intended to send my comment only to Doug, but pushed the wrong
button.


-- 
Peter
Mailto:peternew -at- optonline -dot- net

Adapting old programs to fit new machines
usually means adapting new machines to
behave like old ones.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

*** Deva(tm) Tools for Dreamweaver and Deva(tm) Search ***
Build Contents, Indexes, and Search for Web Sites and Help Systems
Available now at http://www.devahelp.com or info -at- devahelp -dot- com

Sponsored by Cub Lea, specialist in low-cost outsourced development
and documentation. Overload and time-sensitive jobs at exceptional
rates. Unique free gifts for all visitors to http://www.cublea.com

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot-  Visit 
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.