TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: ADMIN: Re: OT How do I unsubscribe? From:"Campbell, Art" <artc -at- northchurch -dot- net> To:"'iain -at- hairydog -dot- co -dot- uk'" <iain -at- hairydog -dot- co -dot- uk>, TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Wed, 26 Jan 2000 13:19:25 -0500
Well, I'll contribute to this useless thread too; no reason to do productive
work this morning. ;-)
As noted, this list is hosted by a listserv server, which is what the
commands
in the footer belong to.
The listname-request address poster is quite correct in his/her syntax.
However,
those commands are majordomo commands, the other major mailing list software
package.
Most commands for one type of server don't work on the other.
Art
Art Campbell
Technical Publications
Newbridge Networks
Five Corporate Drive
Andover, MA 01810
978 691-6344
> -----Original Message-----
> From: iain -at- hairydog -dot- co -dot- uk [mailto:iain -at- hairydog -dot- co -dot- uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2000 10:33 AM
> To: TECHWR-L
> Subject: Re: ADMIN: Re: OT How do I unsubscribe?
>
>
> > If I wanted to unsubscribe, I'd mail techwr-l-request -at- raycomm -dot- com
> > the one-line message "unsubscribe". To unsubscribe from techcomm,
> > I'd mail techcomm-request.
> >
> > I'd be quite upset if those didn't work.
>
> That's a spectacularly silly way to approach it! What's wrong with
> following the simple instruction in the footer?
>
> > This has been an oral tradition standard since before I started
> > using mailing lists, i.e. at least 15 years.
>
> Well, I'd expect a command to listserve@ to be the standard, not
> listname-request -at- -dot-