TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Frame & WWP vs. Word & RoboHelp From:argentadmin <argentadmin -at- AVL -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 24 Aug 1999 16:31:56 +0100
1. Help file to Doc conversion is easy in RoboHelp7 there is help to Doc
converter it takes a click to select your input Help file and destination
DOC file.
Hope it Helps
Sandy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Linda Sims [SMTP:lsims -at- dset -dot- com]
>
> OK, here's the background:
>
> 1. There are two documents here which were originally WRITTEN
> in RoboHelp and then saved as Help files and Word documents.
> (I'm told that converting from RoboHelp to Word required a huge
> amount of reformatting.)
>
> 2. On the current pass through these documents (my first time
> working with them), we decided to update the Help files and the
> Word files separately to avoid having the reformatting issue raise
> its ugly head.
>
> 3. I know nothing about RoboHelp and am mostly a beginner at
> Word.
>
> 4. We have a poobah here who is in love with Word and RoboHelp
> and who seems to think that most people don't need or want actual
> manuals anymore (PDF or hardcopy); instead they want to use
> Help files.
>
>
> My perspective:
>
> 1. I don't have any objection to learning RoboHelp and Word, but I
> don't think they are the right tools for the job.
>
> 2. I don't agree that most people would rather use on-line help and
> not have any manuals to refer to.
>
> 3. I'd rather use Frame with WebWorks so that I can single
> source the documentation. Maintaining this stuff separately is
> pretty stupid, and I'm not savvy enough with the Word/RoboHelp
> set up to get things to the way they're supposed to be (Word as
> the source, with RoboHelp generating files from the Word
> document). Heck, I'm not even sure if it's possible.
>
> My plea:
>
> I need ammunition. By next week, I have to present a good case to
> the poobah that:
>
> (a) Going strictly to on-line help for documentation is not the best
> choice ('Why' would be very useful). As I recall, there was some
> discussion on list about the best way to present information to
> users, and I'm going to check the archives for it; however, I don't
> remember this issue being directly addressed.
>
> (b) Going to Frame + WWP rather than sticking to a Word +
> RoboHelp is a better scenario. (The stability of Frame over Word
> will be a big plus, here, but some people are so blinded by the
> MicroSmurfs that they may not care.) I have all the Frame vs Word
> comparisons that have been referenced on the list; the poobah,
> however, wants us to 'stick to the industry standard'.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
> Lin
>
> Where am I going, and what am I doing in this handbasket?
>
>
> From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=
> =
>