Re: HTML vs HTML Help

Subject: Re: HTML vs HTML Help
From: Svi Ben-Elya <svi -dot- ben-elya -at- AKS -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 14:00:23 GMT

Using RoboHelp or another HAT should simplify the formatting process.

____________________________________
Svi Ben-Elya
svib -at- aks -dot- com
chase -at- netvision -dot- net -dot- il
_____________________________________

On 07/27/99 08:36:27 AM AST James Cort wrote:
>
>I poked around in the archives and couldn't find this question dealt with.
>
>I am an HTML novice and I'm wondering what the difference is between
>straight HTML and HTML Help such as what I presume RoboHTML produces.
>
>If you wish to produce a help-like file in HTML (that is: if you're
>producing something that would serve the same purpose a printed manual
would
>serve) are there any advantages one over the other? What are the strong
>points/weak points of each?
>
>Any information would be greatly appreciated.
>
>Thanks.
>
>
>Jim Cort
>
>
From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=
>
>
>

From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=




Previous by Author: Re: Help files from existing manuals
Next by Author: Re: reporting on FrameMaker styles
Previous by Thread: HTML vs HTML Help
Next by Thread: FW: HTML vs HTML Help


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads