Re: Comprehensive Indexes?

Subject: Re: Comprehensive Indexes?
From: "Porrello, Leonard" <lcporrel -at- ESSVOTE -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 10:14:00 -0600

As a user, I would prefer #3.

I think that #3 is superior because it eliminates the need for cross referencing; the user picks up one index and is sure to find in it what he needs.

Leonard
ES&S
Engineering Scribe

----------
From: jed
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 1999 9:49 AM
To: TECHWR-L; LCPORREL
Subject: Comprehensive Indexes?

Our company develops a simulation product that is highly customizable. The
product has now grown to the size where we have decided to produce two
manuals:

1. A user guide
2. A customization guide

We feel we've divided the information between the two guides intuitively.
However, we are concerned that our user's will not be able to easily find
information if they look in the wrong guide. Here's what we think the
options are:

1. Each manual has it's own index. The user's would be required to learn in
which guide they should look for information.
2. Several key terms are indexed in each guide that say to see the other
guide without referencing a specific page number.
3. Make the guides a two volume set with continuing page numbers so the
index can be completely comprehensive.

From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000



Previous by Author: Re: Ethical Question
Next by Author: Re: STC - academia or real-world?
Previous by Thread: Comprehensive Indexes?
Next by Thread: Re: Comprehensive Indexes?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads