TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Your Opinion Please - Lecture Structure From:Frank Taylor <taylor_f -at- NETVISION -dot- NET -dot- IL> Date:Mon, 16 Nov 1998 14:56:54 +0200
I am putting the finishing touches to the preparations for an exciting
lecture series on a subject that is highly relevant to our profession.
Whilst I have no doubt as to the relevance of the subject, I feel I
should poll your opinion as to the preferred length and structure of the
Your opinion would be most welcome.
Over 2 consecutive days with around 8 hours of intensive lectures per
Over 3 days (consecutive or split,) with around 7 hours of slightly less
intensive lectures per day.
The cost would be around 35% more for Option B.
The lectures in Option B would be less intensive due to the extra time
available and would cover more of the subject.
Would a company prefer to release employees for 2 days rather than 3?
If a company saw the logic in releasing an employee for 3 days, would it
be preferable to spread the lectures over 7-10 days or would 3
consecutive days be more acceptable?
Would freelancers prefer to attend a 2 day lecture series rather than a
3 day one?
I look forward to hearing from you.
Phone: (972) 9 774 0828
Fax: (972) 9 771 1906
email: taylor_f -at- netvision -dot- net -dot- il