TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Including "with" or including "in"? From:Matt Ion <soundy -at- SOUNDY -dot- ML -dot- ORG> Date:Mon, 19 Oct 1998 06:25:14 -0700
On Mon, 19 Oct 1998 10:45:32 +0100, Hans Lonissen wrote:
>Please help me out on this one: is it
>
>"Including images *with* pathology reports"
> or
>
>"Including images *in* pathology reports"
>
>or perhaps something else?
Depends on exactly HOW the images are included. If they're embedded within
the text, they'd be *in* the pathology report. If they're "8x10 color glossy
photographs with circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one
explain' what each one was..." (sorry, couldn't resist :), attached to the
printed material with a paperclip, then they're *with* the pathology report.
Your friend and mine,
Matt
<All standard disclaimers apply>
"Reality is in alpha test on protoype hardware."
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
They shoot without shame / In the name of a piece of dirt
For a change of accent / Or the color of your shirt
Better the pride that resides / In a Citizen of the World
Than the pride that divides / When a colorful rag is unfurled
- Rush, "Territories"
