TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: MSWord Index-generating problem From:Matt Craver <MCraver -at- OPENSOLUTIONS -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 28 Aug 1998 10:24:36 -0400
Deborah Cooper [dcooper -at- INSTEPMOBILE -dot- COM] wrote:
> I'm hoping someone can help me with this Word problem. I have
created
> an Index in my document with these settings:
> Index style = formal
> Headings for accented letters
> Right align page numbers
> 2 columns
> When I generate the index entries, the heading "Index" on my page is
in
> section 1 but
> the entries appear in a section 2 (not created by me, but by word
> somehow). This means
> the first page of the index is correctly numbered 138 but the second
> page of the index
> starts numbering at 2!
Word inserted Section 2 because you told it to without realizing. Changing
the paragraph format to two columns (or changing the page format from
portrait to landscape) requires a new section in Word. To get the page
numbering back to normal:
1. Go to the first page of the new section. Turn on Show/Hide par.
marks to find it, there will be a Section Break Continuous near the top of
page 138
2. Go to Insert...Page Numbers..
3. Make sure the Show number on first page check box is checked
4. Click the Format... button
5. Check the Continue from previous section radio button
6. Close the dialog
You may also need to repeat these steps on the second page of the second
section, and whenever you regenerate the index.
Other Techwhirlers may have a better solution, but this has worked for me.
-Matthew Craver,
Technical Documentation
Open Solutions Inc.
Mcraver -at- opensolutions -dot- com