Re: Response to Documentation Girls Flaming

Subject: Re: Response to Documentation Girls Flaming
From: Toni Williams TPG/SG <towilliams -at- PROCYONGROUP -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 10:22:44 -0700

Except from what she went on to say in the post you partially quoted was
that they refer to themselves as Word Processors. Therefore, I think
there is sufficient reason to think that they are NOT OK with it.

TW

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Posada [SMTP:john -at- TDANDW -dot- COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 1998 6:02 PM
> To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject: Re: Response to Documentation Girls Flaming
>
> Sorry, Melissa...I'm with you.
>
> These are the same people that feel that "best boy" would be
> denigrating
> to those in the movie-making field...even when it's accepted, nobody
> who
> is called it minds, and everyone in that particular environment knows
> it
> to be exactly what it is.
>
> If everyone involved is OK with it, knock yourself out. I've said
> before
> that this PC thing can get carried away.
>
> >
> > >>> Melissa Conniff <mconniff -at- CSC -dot- COM> 08/11 10:26 AM >>>
> > Gang,
> >
> > I've asked an honest question and the majority of responses have
> been
> > to flame me
> > for using the term "girls". Get a life folks! It was not meant in
> a
> > degrading
>
>
>

From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=




Previous by Author: Need a new term for GSD
Next by Author: Re: Response to Documentation Girls Flaming
Previous by Thread: Re: Response to Documentation Girls Flaming
Next by Thread: Re: Response to Documentation Girls Flaming


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads