TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I've been following the discussion about non-technical writing
managers and had a somewhat related/ somewhat off-topic question.
There doesn't appear to be much deliniation between, say, an
inexperienced recent graduate technical writer (who may have a title
of...say...Technical Writer) and an individual with 10 years of
experience (aside, perhaps, from adding Senior to the title in a few
cases).
Along the same lines, the title technical writer can refer to people
like me, a software documentation writer, or someone who writes
science FAQs.
I find that this lack of clarity makes my job harder, since employers
(and co-workers) understandably lump an entire range of skill and
experience into a single title, unlike many other professions where
there are more descriptive titles available.
What sort of titles do you all encounter that differentiate the
experience, skill-set and managerial functions of writers?
